PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPM vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPM vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPM achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 25.97% return. Over the past 10 years, JPM has outperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 21.02%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.28% annualized return.


JPM

1D
2.31%
1M
6.82%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.66%
1Y
21.89%
3Y*
34.22%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
21.02%

ENFR

1D
0.73%
1M
0.52%
YTD
25.97%
6M
26.39%
1Y
26.50%
3Y*
28.39%
5Y*
19.43%
10Y*
12.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPM vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.50%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
25.97%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between JPM and ENFR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between JPM and ENFR has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPM vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPM vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPMENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

3.08

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

8.18

-4.83

JPM vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPM Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPM and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPM vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPM drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPM and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPMENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.16%

-68.28%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.47%

-8.64%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.42%

-15.58%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.77%

-20.29%

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.63%

-62.64%

+19.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-3.91%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-15.95%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

3.25%

+3.29%

Volatility

JPM vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.63%. This indicates that JPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPMENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

5.63%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

11.48%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

14.66%

+7.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.46%

19.30%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.39%

24.67%

+2.72%

Dividends

JPM vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

JPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than ENFR's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
3.98%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.84%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPM and ENFR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPM has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to ENFR (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPM dropped -76.16% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPM and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer