JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L
JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) and FSUS.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - JPLG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while FSUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPLG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FSUS.L.
Performance
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JPLG.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 23.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
FSUS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.76% | 10.11% | 12.09% | 7.05% | 0.72% | 24.67% | 2.57% | -0.56% |
FSUS.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS | 0.00% | 10.65% | 24.39% | 11.36% | -6.29% | 26.79% | 6.64% | 0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPLG.L and FSUS.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JPLG.L and FSUS.L has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Healthcare
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Financial Services
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Technology
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Industrials
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Utilities
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Consumer Defensive
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Energy
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Basic Materials
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Real Estate
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Communication Services
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPLG.L
FSUS.L
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPLG.L | FSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPLG.L | FSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | — | — |
Drawdowns
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPLG.L | FSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | — | — |
Volatility
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPLG.L | FSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.88% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.90% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | — | — |
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPLG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FSUS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPLG.L nor FSUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JPLG.L and FSUS.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FSUS.L.
JPLG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while FSUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while FSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JPLG.L and 0.35% for FSUS.L.
Find the right allocation for JPLG.L and FSUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer