PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JPLG.L

1D
0.68%
1M
3.55%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.53%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*

FSUS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
10.76%10.11%12.09%7.05%0.72%24.67%2.57%-0.56%
FSUS.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS
0.00%10.65%24.39%11.36%-6.29%26.79%6.64%0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between JPLG.L and FSUS.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between JPLG.L and FSUS.L has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPLG.L
FSUS.L

Healthcare

12.2%
8.9%

Financial Services

11.3%
11.8%

Technology

10.7%
38.7%

Industrials

10.5%
5.1%

Utilities

9.3%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
4.4%

Energy

8.4%
3.9%

Basic Materials

8.1%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
10.7%

Real Estate

7.5%
1.3%

Communication Services

5.8%
11.9%

Healthcare

JPLG.L
12.2%
FSUS.L
8.9%

Financial Services

JPLG.L
11.3%
FSUS.L
11.8%

Technology

JPLG.L
10.7%
FSUS.L
38.7%

Industrials

JPLG.L
10.5%
FSUS.L
5.1%

Utilities

JPLG.L
9.3%
FSUS.L
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

JPLG.L
8.4%
FSUS.L
4.4%

Energy

JPLG.L
8.4%
FSUS.L
3.9%

Basic Materials

JPLG.L
8.1%
FSUS.L
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JPLG.L
7.9%
FSUS.L
10.7%

Real Estate

JPLG.L
7.5%
FSUS.L
1.3%

Communication Services

JPLG.L
5.8%
FSUS.L
11.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPLG.LFSUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.36

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPLG.LFSUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

Drawdowns

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPLG.LFSUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

Volatility

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPLG.LFSUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPLG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FSUS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPLG.L vs. FSUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPLG.L nor FSUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPLG.L and FSUS.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FSUS.L.

JPLG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while FSUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while FSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JPLG.L and 0.35% for FSUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPLG.L and FSUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer