PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPLD vs. FLDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JPLD vs. FLDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JPLD vs. FLDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPLD achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than FLDB's 0.80% return.


JPLD

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
0.38%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLDB

1D
0.06%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.91%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JPLD vs. FLDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPLD has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDB's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

JPLD vs. FLDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDB
FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPLD vs. FLDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPLDFLDBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

4.45

-1.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.05

7.69

-3.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

2.09

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

11.28

-7.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.92

64.34

-44.42

JPLD vs. FLDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is lower than the FLDB Sharpe Ratio of 4.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPLD and FLDB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPLDFLDBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

4.45

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.28

3.62

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between JPLD and FLDB is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

JPLD vs. FLDB - Dividend Comparison

JPLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than FLDB's 4.55% yield.


Drawdowns

JPLD vs. FLDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPLD drawdown since its inception was -1.17%, which is greater than FLDB's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLD and FLDB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JPLDFLDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-0.49%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.17%

-0.40%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

0.00%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-0.05%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

0.07%

+0.17%

Volatility

JPLD vs. FLDB - Volatility Comparison

J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) at 0.28%. This indicates that JPLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JPLDFLDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.28%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.99%

0.68%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79%

1.07%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.86%

1.33%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.86%

1.33%

+0.53%