PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPJP.L vs. VPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPJP.L vs. VPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPJP.L is traded in GBP, while VPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VPL values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPJP.L achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 29.53% return. Over the past 10 years, JPJP.L has underperformed VPL with an annualized return of 10.23%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.


JPJP.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
6.24%
YTD
16.36%
6M
15.47%
1Y
34.12%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
10.23%

VPL

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.98%
YTD
29.53%
6M
30.27%
1Y
52.68%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPJP.L vs. VPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPJP.L
SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
16.36%17.50%9.02%13.95%-7.16%2.15%12.42%13.92%-8.48%13.12%
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
29.53%23.21%3.46%9.80%-5.12%2.06%13.23%13.67%-9.32%17.70%

Correlation

The correlation between JPJP.L and VPL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.72

The correlation between JPJP.L and VPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPJP.L vs. VPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPJP.L
VPL

Industrials

26.0%
20.5%

Technology

19.1%
22.6%

Financial Services

17.5%
19.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
9.6%

Communication Services

7.9%
4.8%

Healthcare

6.3%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
7.3%

Real Estate

2.3%
4.3%

Utilities

1.1%
1.6%

Energy

1.1%
1.6%

Industrials

JPJP.L
26.0%
VPL
20.5%

Technology

JPJP.L
19.1%
VPL
22.6%

Financial Services

JPJP.L
17.5%
VPL
19.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JPJP.L
12.1%
VPL
9.6%

Communication Services

JPJP.L
7.9%
VPL
4.8%

Healthcare

JPJP.L
6.3%
VPL
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

JPJP.L
3.6%
VPL
3.5%

Basic Materials

JPJP.L
3.0%
VPL
7.3%

Real Estate

JPJP.L
2.3%
VPL
4.3%

Utilities

JPJP.L
1.1%
VPL
1.6%

Energy

JPJP.L
1.1%
VPL
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPJP.L vs. VPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPJP.L
JPJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JPJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VPL
VPL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPJP.L vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPJP.LVPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.57

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

4.66

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.20

17.13

-6.93

JPJP.L vs. VPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the VPL Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPJP.L and VPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPJP.LVPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

3.09

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.78

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.71

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.41

+0.17

Drawdowns

JPJP.L vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.23%, smaller than the maximum VPL drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPJP.L and VPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPJP.LVPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.23%

-36.13%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-11.36%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.21%

-13.93%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.57%

-14.92%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.23%

-27.02%

+2.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.98%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-6.84%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.08%

+0.26%

Volatility

JPJP.L vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) is 4.15%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that JPJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPJP.LVPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

6.41%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

14.62%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

17.16%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

14.64%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

16.23%

-0.29%

JPJP.L vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPJP.L vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison

JPJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPJP.L
SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
2.75%4.01%3.15%3.12%2.75%3.19%1.81%2.84%3.06%2.57%2.65%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPJP.L and VPL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VPL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VPL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JPJP.L.

JPJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while VPL is Asia Pacific Equities. JPJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JPJP.L and 0.08% for VPL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPJP.L and VPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer