JPJP.L vs. IUSA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L).
JPJP.L and IUSA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JPJP.L is a passively managed fund by State Street Global Advisors Europe Limited that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Nov 30, 2015. IUSA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 15, 2002. Both JPJP.L and IUSA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JPJP.L or IUSA.L.
Key characteristics
| JPJP.L | IUSA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.65% | 26.53% |
| 1Y Return | 11.83% | 32.49% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.10% | 12.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.22% | 16.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.74 | 2.88 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.07 | 4.08 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.56 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.92 | 5.03 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.64 | 20.51 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.47% | 1.57% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.96% | 11.12% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.23% | -38.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.86% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPJP.L and IUSA.L is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
JPJP.L vs. IUSA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, JPJP.L achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than IUSA.L's 26.53% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JPJP.L vs. IUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JPJP.L vs. IUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JPJP.L vs. IUSA.L - Dividend Comparison
JPJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPJP.L SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSA.L iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist | 1.27% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 1.39% | 1.80% | 1.96% | 2.22% | 1.95% | 1.75% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
JPJP.L vs. IUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.23%, smaller than the maximum IUSA.L drawdown of -38.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPJP.L and IUSA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JPJP.L vs. IUSA.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) at 3.34%. This indicates that JPJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.