JPIE vs. NEA
JPIE (JPMorgan Income ETF) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while NEA (Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, JPIE returned 6.52%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for NEA. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPIE charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for NEA.
Performance
JPIE vs. NEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPIE achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than NEA's 3.22% return.
JPIE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
JPIE vs. NEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPIE JPMorgan Income ETF | 1.54% | 7.39% | 6.32% | 7.07% | -6.13% | 0.27% |
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | 3.22% | 11.31% | 9.50% | 0.75% | -23.32% | 3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPIE and NEA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021 | 0.50 |
The correlation between JPIE and NEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPIE vs. NEA — Risk / Return Rank
JPIE
NEA
JPIE vs. NEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPIE | NEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.80 | 1.29 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | 2.15 | +2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.56 | 8.57 | +15.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPIE vs. NEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPIE drawdown since its inception was -9.96%, smaller than the maximum NEA drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPIE and NEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPIE | NEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -43.83% | +33.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.15% | -7.27% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.40% | -15.16% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -4.02% | +3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -8.00% | +5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 1.82% | -1.59% |
Volatility
JPIE vs. NEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) is 0.62%, while Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that JPIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPIE | NEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 2.67% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.34% | 8.67% | -7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62% | 10.72% | -9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 11.52% | -8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 11.82% | -8.31% |
JPIE vs. NEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPIE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NEA's 1.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPIE vs. NEA - Dividend Comparison
JPIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than NEA's 7.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPIE JPMorgan Income ETF | 5.61% | 5.65% | 6.11% | 5.70% | 4.49% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | 7.13% | 7.36% | 6.63% | 3.95% | 5.49% | 4.50% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 5.40% | 5.33% | 5.70% | 5.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPIE and NEA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEA has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to JPIE (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPIE dropped -9.96% vs NEA's -43.83%.
JPIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPIE and NEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer