JPIB vs. FLCO
JPIB (JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF) and FLCO (Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPIB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while FLCO is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPIB returned 2.83%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FLCO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPIB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FLCO.
Performance
JPIB vs. FLCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPIB achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than FLCO's 0.40% return.
JPIB
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
JPIB vs. FLCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 0.74% | 8.19% | 3.48% | 8.68% | -6.38% | 0.14% | 7.14% | 10.76% | -2.17% | 2.61% |
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 0.40% | 7.53% | 1.93% | 7.94% | -16.08% | -2.06% | 10.01% | 14.82% | -3.06% | 2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPIB and FLCO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2017 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, JPIB and FLCO have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
JPIB vs. FLCO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPIB
FLCO
Financial Services
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Financial Services
JPIB
FLCO
Communication Services
JPIB
FLCO
Utilities
JPIB
FLCO
-
Energy
JPIB
FLCO
Consumer Cyclical
JPIB
FLCO
Healthcare
JPIB
FLCO
Technology
JPIB
FLCO
Basic Materials
JPIB
FLCO
Real Estate
JPIB
FLCO
-
Consumer Defensive
JPIB
FLCO
Industrials
JPIB
FLCO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPIB vs. FLCO — Risk / Return Rank
JPIB
FLCO
JPIB vs. FLCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) and Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPIB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.05 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 6.16 | -1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPIB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.28 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.02 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.32 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
JPIB vs. FLCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPIB drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, smaller than the maximum FLCO drawdown of -22.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPIB and FLCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPIB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.13% | -22.71% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.75% | -2.76% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.75% | -6.59% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.83% | -22.48% | +10.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -2.37% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -5.88% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 0.92% | +0.15% |
Volatility
JPIB vs. FLCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) is 1.08%, while Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that JPIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPIB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 1.44% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 3.24% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 4.42% | -0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.11% | 7.15% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 6.83% | -2.39% |
JPIB vs. FLCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPIB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPIB vs. FLCO - Dividend Comparison
JPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than FLCO's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 4.66% | 4.60% | 4.63% | 3.83% | 3.85% | 2.85% | 3.99% | 3.39% | 3.86% | 3.33% | 0.51% |
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 5.02% | 4.85% | 4.57% | 4.35% | 3.10% | 2.59% | 3.14% | 4.66% | 5.83% | 1.81% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPIB and FLCO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCO has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to JPIB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPIB dropped -13.13% vs FLCO's -22.71%.
On 5-year performance, JPIB leads with 2.83% vs 0.17% for FLCO. On fees, FLCO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JPIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JPIB has performed better with a 2.83% return vs 0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLCO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JPIB.
JPIB has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 4.66% for FLCO.
JPIB is categorized as Global Bonds, while FLCO is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JPIB and 0.35% for FLCO.
JPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPIB and FLCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer