PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPHSX vs. MLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPHSX vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPHSX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 23.59% return. Over the past 10 years, JPHSX has underperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 3.80%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.41% annualized return.


JPHSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.69%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
3.80%

MLPX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
23.59%
6M
23.51%
1Y
22.94%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
20.92%
10Y*
12.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPHSX vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPHSX
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund
1.20%0.89%7.14%11.07%-2.13%4.57%1.28%7.15%-0.31%3.05%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
23.59%4.96%42.90%15.77%21.54%39.63%-20.32%19.04%-15.64%-4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between JPHSX and MLPX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2013

0.23

The correlation between JPHSX and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPHSX vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPHSX
JPHSX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JPHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JPHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPHSX vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPHSXMLPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.50

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

2.09

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.26

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.82

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.14

7.27

-0.12

JPHSX vs. MLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the MLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPHSX and MLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPHSXMLPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.50

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.72

1.05

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.47

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.35

+0.74

Drawdowns

JPHSX vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPHSX drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPHSX and MLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPHSXMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-70.67%

+49.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-8.18%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.10%

-16.77%

+12.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.84%

-19.72%

+12.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.95%

-64.70%

+43.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-5.68%

+5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-16.63%

+15.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

3.17%

-2.71%

Volatility

JPHSX vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) is 0.34%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that JPHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPHSXMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

6.41%

-6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

11.84%

-10.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

15.38%

-13.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

20.08%

-17.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

26.50%

-22.85%

JPHSX vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPHSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPHSX vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison

JPHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than MLPX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPHSX
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund
7.01%6.84%9.21%7.94%5.12%3.34%3.88%5.27%4.57%3.78%4.49%4.52%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.15%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPHSX and MLPX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to JPHSX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPHSX dropped -20.95% vs MLPX's -70.67%.

JPHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPHSX and MLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer