PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPEM vs. EMGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPEM vs. EMGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPEM achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMGF's 25.77% return. Over the past 10 years, JPEM has underperformed EMGF with an annualized return of 7.89%, while EMGF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.25% annualized return.


JPEM

1D
-2.89%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
4.39%
6M
4.70%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
7.89%

EMGF

1D
-5.41%
1M
2.79%
YTD
25.77%
6M
26.91%
1Y
46.43%
3Y*
25.52%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPEM vs. EMGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.39%22.90%4.23%11.01%-9.03%8.11%-0.46%16.21%-10.55%28.80%
EMGF
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
25.77%31.41%9.06%10.86%-16.55%6.65%10.27%20.96%-19.71%42.37%

Correlation

The correlation between JPEM and EMGF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2015

0.85

The correlation between JPEM and EMGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPEM vs. EMGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPEM
EMGF

Financial Services

19.2%
17.4%

Industrials

12.7%
7.2%

Basic Materials

11.4%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.6%

Utilities

9.1%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
3.4%

Communication Services

8.3%
6.5%

Technology

7.8%
41.4%

Energy

7.1%
3.6%

Healthcare

4.2%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.0%

Financial Services

JPEM
19.2%
EMGF
17.4%

Industrials

JPEM
12.7%
EMGF
7.2%

Basic Materials

JPEM
11.4%
EMGF
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JPEM
9.9%
EMGF
9.6%

Utilities

JPEM
9.1%
EMGF
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

JPEM
8.5%
EMGF
3.4%

Communication Services

JPEM
8.3%
EMGF
6.5%

Technology

JPEM
7.8%
EMGF
41.4%

Energy

JPEM
7.1%
EMGF
3.6%

Healthcare

JPEM
4.2%
EMGF
2.4%

Real Estate

JPEM
1.8%
EMGF
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPEM vs. EMGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPEM
JPEM Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
JPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EMGF
EMGF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EMGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMGF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EMGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMGF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPEM vs. EMGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPEMEMGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.45

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

12.68

-5.86

JPEM vs. EMGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the EMGF Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPEM and EMGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPEM vs. EMGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPEM drawdown since its inception was -40.22%, roughly equal to the maximum EMGF drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPEM and EMGF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPEMEMGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.22%

-40.23%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-13.54%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.30%

-17.65%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-28.20%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-40.23%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.61%

-5.41%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-10.02%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.67%

-0.78%

Volatility

JPEM vs. EMGF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) is 5.57%, while iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) has a volatility of 12.64%. This indicates that JPEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPEMEMGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

12.64%

-7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

20.71%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

22.67%

-8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.64%

18.34%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

19.67%

-2.70%

JPEM vs. EMGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPEM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than EMGF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPEM vs. EMGF - Dividend Comparison

JPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than EMGF's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMGF
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.00%2.52%3.42%5.94%4.04%2.48%1.95%2.63%2.73%1.94%2.04%0.00%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.52%4.65%5.12%4.46%4.71%4.40%2.85%3.47%2.79%2.14%1.28%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPEM and EMGF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMGF has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to JPEM (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPEM dropped -40.22% vs EMGF's -40.23%.

On 10-year performance, EMGF leads with 11.25% vs 7.89% for JPEM. On fees, JPEM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, JPEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EMGF has performed better with a 11.25% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPEM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMGF.

JPEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 2.00% for EMGF.

JPEM tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor Emerging Markets Equity Index, while EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JPEM and 0.45% for EMGF.

EMGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPEM and EMGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer