PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPEM vs. EELV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPEM vs. EELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPEM achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than EELV's 5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, JPEM has outperformed EELV with an annualized return of 8.20%, while EELV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.96% annualized return.


JPEM

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.31%
YTD
7.50%
6M
8.40%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
8.20%

EELV

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.58%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.82%
1Y
16.53%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
6.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPEM vs. EELV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
7.50%22.90%4.23%11.01%-9.03%8.11%-0.46%16.21%-10.55%28.80%
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
5.40%21.97%1.90%8.85%-3.98%16.15%-3.89%8.89%-5.40%24.89%

Correlation

The correlation between JPEM and EELV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2015

0.83

The correlation between JPEM and EELV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPEM vs. EELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPEM
EELV

Financial Services

19.2%
37.8%

Industrials

12.7%
8.9%

Basic Materials

11.4%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
3.9%

Utilities

9.1%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
10.9%

Communication Services

8.3%
9.7%

Technology

7.8%
0.2%

Energy

7.1%
6.5%

Healthcare

4.2%
5.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.6%

Financial Services

JPEM
19.2%
EELV
37.8%

Industrials

JPEM
12.7%
EELV
8.9%

Basic Materials

JPEM
11.4%
EELV
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JPEM
9.9%
EELV
3.9%

Utilities

JPEM
9.1%
EELV
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

JPEM
8.5%
EELV
10.9%

Communication Services

JPEM
8.3%
EELV
9.7%

Technology

JPEM
7.8%
EELV
0.2%

Energy

JPEM
7.1%
EELV
6.5%

Healthcare

JPEM
4.2%
EELV
5.2%

Real Estate

JPEM
1.8%
EELV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPEM vs. EELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPEM
JPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

EELV
EELV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELV Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPEM vs. EELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPEMEELVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.02

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

6.45

+1.91

JPEM vs. EELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the EELV Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPEM and EELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPEM vs. EELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPEM drawdown since its inception was -40.22%, which is greater than EELV's maximum drawdown of -36.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPEM and EELV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPEMEELVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.22%

-36.35%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-8.22%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.30%

-11.79%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-19.04%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-36.35%

-3.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-3.41%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-8.91%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.57%

+0.30%

Volatility

JPEM vs. EELV - Volatility Comparison

J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) at 3.40%. This indicates that JPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPEMEELVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

3.40%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

9.28%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

11.11%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

11.39%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

13.62%

+3.40%

JPEM vs. EELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPEM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than EELV's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPEM vs. EELV - Dividend Comparison

JPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than EELV's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
5.14%3.75%4.70%4.00%3.45%4.35%2.82%3.14%5.50%2.92%2.29%2.53%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.39%4.65%5.12%4.46%4.71%4.40%2.85%3.47%2.79%2.14%1.28%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPEM and EELV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPEM has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to EELV (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPEM dropped -40.22% vs EELV's -36.35%.

On 10-year performance, JPEM leads with 8.20% vs 6.96% for EELV. On fees, EELV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EELV has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JPEM has performed better with a 8.20% return vs 6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EELV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JPEM.

EELV has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 4.39% for JPEM.

JPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EELV is Volatility Hedged Equity. JPEM tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor Emerging Markets Equity Index, while EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JPEM and 0.30% for EELV.

JPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPEM and EELV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer