PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPAN vs. MINV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPAN vs. MINV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPAN achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly lower than MINV's 59.64% return.


JPAN

1D
0.63%
1M
0.47%
YTD
17.82%
6M
17.04%
1Y
31.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MINV

1D
1.72%
1M
0.70%
YTD
59.64%
6M
60.18%
1Y
84.16%
3Y*
35.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPAN vs. MINV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
17.82%22.96%18.16%5.17%
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
59.64%30.85%17.32%7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JPAN and MINV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.53

The correlation between JPAN and MINV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPAN vs. MINV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPAN
MINV

Industrials

24.2%
19.2%

Technology

22.4%
67.2%

Financial Services

17.4%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.9%
3.7%

Communication Services

7.0%
2.3%

Basic Materials

5.3%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%

-

Healthcare

2.7%
4.6%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Energy

0.7%
1.7%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

JPAN
24.2%
MINV
19.2%

Technology

JPAN
22.4%
MINV
67.2%

Financial Services

JPAN
17.4%
MINV
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JPAN
14.9%
MINV
3.7%

Communication Services

JPAN
7.0%
MINV
2.3%

Basic Materials

JPAN
5.3%
MINV
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

JPAN
3.3%
MINV

-

Healthcare

JPAN
2.7%
MINV
4.6%

Real Estate

JPAN
2.2%
MINV

-

Energy

JPAN
0.7%
MINV
1.7%

Utilities

JPAN

-

MINV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPAN vs. MINV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPAN
JPAN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JPAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JPAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MINV
MINV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPAN vs. MINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPANMINVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.51

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

7.76

-5.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

19.30

-11.56

JPAN vs. MINV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the MINV Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPAN and MINV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPAN vs. MINV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPAN drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum MINV drawdown of -23.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPAN and MINV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPANMINVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-23.49%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-10.91%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-5.14%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-8.03%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

4.38%

-0.25%

Volatility

JPAN vs. MINV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) is 7.46%, while Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a volatility of 15.96%. This indicates that JPAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPANMINVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

15.96%

-8.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

25.92%

-8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.59%

28.96%

-8.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.51%

24.77%

-5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

24.77%

-5.26%

JPAN vs. MINV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JPAN and MINV have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

JPAN vs. MINV - Dividend Comparison

JPAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than MINV's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
4.33%5.10%1.53%0.51%
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
0.95%1.51%0.25%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPAN and MINV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINV has higher volatility (15.96%) compared to JPAN (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPAN dropped -15.24% vs MINV's -23.49%.

On 1-year performance, MINV leads with 84.16% vs 31.86% for JPAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JPAN has been the lower-risk option at 7.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MINV has performed better with a 84.16% return vs 31.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPAN and MINV have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

JPAN has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.95% for MINV.

JPAN is categorized as Japan Equities, while MINV is Asia Pacific Equities.

MINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPAN and MINV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer