JPAN vs. MCH

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

JPAN (Matthews Japan Active ETF) and MCH (Matthews China Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPAN is a Japan Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while MCH is a China Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JPAN returned 31.86% vs 19.28% for MCH. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

JPAN vs. MCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPAN achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly higher than MCH's 3.27% return.

JPAN

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 17.82%
• 6M: 17.04%
• 1Y: 31.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MCH

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 19.28%
• 3Y*: 13.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPAN vs. MCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JPAN Matthews Japan Active ETF	17.82%	22.96%	18.16%	5.17%
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	3.27%	30.20%	17.32%	-4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between JPAN and MCH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.35

The correlation between JPAN and MCH shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JPAN vs. MCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JPAN	MCH
Industrials	24.2%	17.0%
Technology	22.4%	17.5%
Financial Services	17.4%	20.7%
Consumer Cyclical	14.9%	13.3%
Communication Services	7.0%	12.2%
Basic Materials	5.3%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	0.6%
Healthcare	2.7%	4.4%
Real Estate	2.2%	2.9%
Energy	0.7%	0.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

JPAN vs. MCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPAN

JPAN Risk / Return Rank: 51
JPAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
JPAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
JPAN Omega Ratio Rank: 51
JPAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
JPAN Martin Ratio Rank: 51

MCH

MCH Risk / Return Rank: 27
MCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MCH Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MCH Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPAN vs. MCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPAN	MCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	0.94	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.41	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.17	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	1.29	+0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.73	3.40	+4.34

JPAN vs. MCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the MCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPAN and MCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPAN vs. MCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPAN drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum MCH drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPAN and MCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPAN	MCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.24%	-40.53%	+25.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.59%	-15.05%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.48%	-4.07%	+0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.09%	-18.28%	+15.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	5.70%	-1.57%

Volatility

JPAN vs. MCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) is 7.46%, while Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that JPAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPAN	MCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.46%	8.06%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.05%	15.64%	+1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.59%	20.72%	-0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.51%	29.48%	-9.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.51%	29.48%	-9.97%

JPAN vs. MCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JPAN and MCH have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

JPAN vs. MCH - Dividend Comparison

JPAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than MCH's 1.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JPAN Matthews Japan Active ETF	4.33%	5.10%	1.53%	0.51%
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	1.70%	1.76%	1.31%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPAN and MCH in my portfolio?

JPAN and MCH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JPAN or MCH?

MCH has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to JPAN (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPAN dropped -15.24% vs MCH's -40.53%.

Which ETF is better, JPAN or MCH?

On 1-year performance, JPAN leads with 31.86% vs 19.28% for MCH. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JPAN has been the lower-risk option at 7.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPAN or MCH?

Over the 1-year period, JPAN has performed better with a 31.86% return vs 19.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPAN or MCH?

JPAN and MCH have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPAN or MCH?

JPAN has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 1.70% for MCH.

What is the main difference between JPAN and MCH?

JPAN is categorized as Japan Equities, while MCH is China Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.