PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPAN vs. FLJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JPAN vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JPAN vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
5.22%22.96%18.16%5.77%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
9.29%25.26%25.89%1.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPAN achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 9.29% return.


JPAN

1D
3.00%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
5.22%
6M
9.80%
1Y
29.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLJH

1D
2.72%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
17.51%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JPAN vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JPAN vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPAN
JPAN Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JPAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPAN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JPAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPAN vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPANFLJHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.77

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

2.43

-0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

3.32

-1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.54

12.34

-4.80

JPAN vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPAN and FLJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPANFLJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.77

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.69

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between JPAN and FLJH is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JPAN vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

JPAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than FLJH's 3.57% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
4.85%5.10%1.53%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.57%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%

Drawdowns

JPAN vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPAN drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPAN and FLJH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JPANFLJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-31.51%

+16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-11.83%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.64%

-5.01%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-5.39%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

3.19%

+0.67%

Volatility

JPAN vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 7.76%. This indicates that JPAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JPANFLJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

7.76%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

14.50%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

23.00%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

18.50%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.15%

19.90%

-0.75%