JNVSX vs. MDPIX
JNVSX (Jensen Quality Value Fund) and MDPIX (ProFunds Mid Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, JNVSX returned 11.17%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for MDPIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JNVSX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for MDPIX.
Performance
JNVSX vs. MDPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNVSX achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than MDPIX's 14.15% return. Over the past 10 years, JNVSX has outperformed MDPIX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while MDPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.
JNVSX
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- -2.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
MDPIX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 14.15%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
JNVSX vs. MDPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | -1.11% | -2.58% | 9.40% | 18.58% | -15.83% | 60.71% | 14.79% | 27.58% | -9.03% | 15.08% |
MDPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Fund | 14.15% | 5.68% | 11.55% | 14.16% | -14.81% | 21.89% | 11.24% | 23.46% | -12.78% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNVSX and MDPIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JNVSX and MDPIX has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNVSX vs. MDPIX — Risk / Return Rank
JNVSX
MDPIX
JNVSX vs. MDPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) and ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNVSX | MDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.25 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.51 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 9.02 | -9.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNVSX vs. MDPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNVSX drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, smaller than the maximum MDPIX drawdown of -57.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNVSX and MDPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNVSX | MDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.52% | -57.32% | +22.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -9.02% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.43% | -24.59% | +7.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.56% | -24.86% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.52% | -42.07% | +7.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.54% | -0.54% | -9.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -8.67% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.56% | 2.51% | +3.05% |
Volatility
JNVSX vs. MDPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) is 3.47%, while ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that JNVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNVSX | MDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 4.68% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 11.69% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 15.78% | -2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 19.74% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 20.71% | -1.48% |
JNVSX vs. MDPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNVSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MDPIX's 1.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNVSX vs. MDPIX - Dividend Comparison
JNVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.38%, more than MDPIX's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | 11.38% | 11.31% | 6.15% | 0.56% | 2.69% | 22.40% | 1.27% | 5.13% | 6.15% | 4.14% | 1.34% | 17.62% |
MDPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Fund | 0.36% | 0.41% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 0.24% | 5.00% | 3.00% | 7.60% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNVSX and MDPIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDPIX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to JNVSX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNVSX dropped -34.52% vs MDPIX's -57.32%.
MDPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNVSX and MDPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer