JNVSX vs. FHUMX
JNVSX (Jensen Quality Value Fund) and FHUMX (Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, JNVSX returned 7.92%/yr vs 5.84%/yr for FHUMX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JNVSX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FHUMX.
Performance
JNVSX vs. FHUMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNVSX achieves a -2.57% return, which is significantly lower than FHUMX's 12.85% return.
JNVSX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- -2.57%
- 6M
- -3.63%
- 1Y
- -4.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
FHUMX
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 12.85%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 14.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
JNVSX vs. FHUMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | -2.57% | -2.58% | 9.40% | 18.58% | -15.83% | 60.71% | 24.06% |
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 12.85% | -1.38% | 9.90% | 21.92% | -16.51% | 22.94% | 27.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNVSX and FHUMX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JNVSX and FHUMX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNVSX vs. FHUMX — Risk / Return Rank
JNVSX
FHUMX
JNVSX vs. FHUMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) and Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNVSX | FHUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.15 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 1.47 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 4.29 | -4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNVSX vs. FHUMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNVSX drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, which is greater than FHUMX's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNVSX and FHUMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNVSX | FHUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.52% | -29.48% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -11.58% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.43% | -29.48% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.56% | -29.48% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.88% | -2.81% | -8.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -8.14% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.54% | 3.83% | +1.71% |
Volatility
JNVSX vs. FHUMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) is 3.31%, while Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that JNVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHUMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNVSX | FHUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 8.95% | -5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.41% | 16.39% | -6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 20.95% | -8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 21.49% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 21.21% | -1.99% |
JNVSX vs. FHUMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNVSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FHUMX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNVSX vs. FHUMX - Dividend Comparison
JNVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.55%, more than FHUMX's 7.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 7.58% | 8.56% | 0.93% | 4.41% | 2.77% | 4.05% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | 11.55% | 11.31% | 6.15% | 0.56% | 2.69% | 22.40% | 1.27% | 5.13% | 6.15% | 4.14% | 1.34% | 17.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNVSX and FHUMX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHUMX has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to JNVSX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNVSX dropped -34.52% vs FHUMX's -29.48%.
FHUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNVSX and FHUMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer