PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNUSX vs. BISAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNUSX vs. BISAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Value Fund (JNUSX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUSX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than BISAX's 1.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JNUSX having a 10.63% annualized return and BISAX not far ahead at 10.66%.


JNUSX

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.91%
YTD
9.53%
6M
13.74%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*
10.63%

BISAX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
1.11%
6M
4.25%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
29.23%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNUSX vs. BISAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNUSX
JPMorgan International Value Fund
9.53%48.51%9.94%19.06%-5.17%16.55%-3.92%15.55%-18.62%22.26%
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
1.11%45.50%23.18%39.03%-8.68%18.39%4.62%6.80%-20.13%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUSX and BISAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.81

The correlation between JNUSX and BISAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNUSX vs. BISAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNUSX
JNUSX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JNUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BISAX
BISAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BISAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BISAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNUSX vs. BISAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Value Fund (JNUSX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNUSXBISAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

1.37

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

2.05

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.46

+1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.23

4.37

+6.86

JNUSX vs. BISAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the BISAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUSX and BISAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNUSXBISAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.37

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

1.23

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.75

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.82

-0.53

Drawdowns

JNUSX vs. BISAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUSX drawdown since its inception was -62.24%, which is greater than BISAX's maximum drawdown of -47.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUSX and BISAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNUSXBISAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.24%

-47.30%

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-11.63%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-11.63%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.49%

-31.44%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.34%

-47.30%

-1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.83%

-7.23%

+4.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.28%

-8.04%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.87%

-0.95%

Volatility

JNUSX vs. BISAX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Value Fund (JNUSX) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) at 3.13%. This indicates that JNUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BISAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNUSXBISAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.13%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

9.97%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

12.38%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

13.88%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

14.28%

+3.70%

JNUSX vs. BISAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUSX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BISAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNUSX vs. BISAX - Dividend Comparison

JNUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than BISAX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
3.19%3.23%3.06%2.81%3.87%3.46%0.81%0.66%3.88%8.33%4.00%3.44%
JNUSX
JPMorgan International Value Fund
2.66%2.92%4.51%5.14%3.93%5.02%2.89%4.22%4.56%2.44%6.43%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNUSX and BISAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNUSX has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to BISAX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUSX dropped -62.24% vs BISAX's -47.30%.

JNUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNUSX and BISAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer