JNUSX vs. QIACX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan International Value Fund (JNUSX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX).
JNUSX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Nov 3, 1993. QIACX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
JNUSX vs. QIACX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNUSX vs. QIACX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNUSX JPMorgan International Value Fund | 4.77% | 48.51% | 9.94% | 19.06% | -5.17% | 16.55% | -3.92% | 15.55% | -18.62% | 22.26% |
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund | -4.89% | 21.15% | 31.07% | 23.52% | -14.16% | 31.40% | 21.95% | 26.91% | -2.64% | 21.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNUSX achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly higher than QIACX's -4.89% return. Over the past 10 years, JNUSX has underperformed QIACX with an annualized return of 10.47%, while QIACX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.59% annualized return.
JNUSX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 37.04%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
QIACX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNUSX vs. QIACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNUSX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than QIACX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNUSX vs. QIACX — Risk / Return Rank
JNUSX
QIACX
JNUSX vs. QIACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Value Fund (JNUSX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNUSX | QIACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | 1.15 | +1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.84 | 1.67 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.28 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 1.38 | +1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 6.70 | +5.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNUSX | QIACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.15 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.84 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.84 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.55 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNUSX and QIACX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JNUSX vs. QIACX - Dividend Comparison
JNUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than QIACX's 4.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNUSX JPMorgan International Value Fund | 2.78% | 2.92% | 4.51% | 5.14% | 3.93% | 5.02% | 2.89% | 4.22% | 4.56% | 2.44% | 6.43% | 1.38% |
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund | 4.81% | 4.58% | 8.65% | 1.40% | 10.90% | 17.44% | 3.01% | 3.34% | 8.60% | 0.69% | 1.12% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
JNUSX vs. QIACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNUSX drawdown since its inception was -62.24%, roughly equal to the maximum QIACX drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUSX and QIACX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNUSX | QIACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.24% | -60.11% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -11.99% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.49% | -23.05% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.34% | -36.47% | -11.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -5.88% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -9.36% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.46% | +0.45% |
Volatility
JNUSX vs. QIACX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan International Value Fund (JNUSX) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) at 5.39%. This indicates that JNUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNUSX | QIACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.15% | 5.39% | +1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 9.95% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 16.22% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 17.39% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 18.72% | -0.73% |