PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNUG vs. UMDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNUG vs. UMDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -32.23% return, which is significantly lower than UMDD's 41.42% return. Over the past 10 years, JNUG has underperformed UMDD with an annualized return of -26.31%, while UMDD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.


JNUG

1D
6.13%
1M
-37.63%
YTD
-32.23%
6M
-30.59%
1Y
61.91%
3Y*
61.16%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
-26.31%

UMDD

1D
2.20%
1M
10.73%
YTD
41.42%
6M
35.75%
1Y
66.43%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNUG vs. UMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares
-32.23%478.59%9.96%-4.79%-43.60%-46.61%-85.51%82.43%-48.11%-20.18%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
41.42%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-40.29%49.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUG and UMDD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

0.17

The correlation between JNUG and UMDD shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JNUG vs. UMDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNUG
UMDD

Basic Materials

100.0%
2.6%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.2%

Energy

-

2.7%

Financial Services

-

7.1%

Healthcare

-

4.8%

Industrials

-

13.4%

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Technology

-

9.0%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Basic Materials

JNUG
100.0%
UMDD
2.6%

Communication Services

JNUG

-

UMDD
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JNUG

-

UMDD
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

JNUG

-

UMDD
2.2%

Energy

JNUG

-

UMDD
2.7%

Financial Services

JNUG

-

UMDD
7.1%

Healthcare

JNUG

-

UMDD
4.8%

Industrials

JNUG

-

UMDD
13.4%

Real Estate

JNUG

-

UMDD
3.9%

Technology

JNUG

-

UMDD
9.0%

Utilities

JNUG

-

UMDD
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNUG vs. UMDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNUG vs. UMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNUGUMDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.56

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.26

8.58

-6.32

JNUG vs. UMDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the UMDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUG and UMDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNUG vs. UMDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than UMDD's maximum drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and UMDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNUGUMDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-86.24%

-13.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.53%

-26.04%

-41.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.53%

-60.33%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.07%

-64.61%

-15.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.66%

-86.24%

-13.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.62%

-3.15%

-96.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.87%

-23.58%

-70.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.53%

7.78%

+19.75%

Volatility

JNUG vs. UMDD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) has a higher volatility of 39.22% compared to ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) at 14.80%. This indicates that JNUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNUGUMDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.22%

14.80%

+24.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.34%

35.26%

+53.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.58%

47.64%

+54.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.23%

59.05%

+22.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.73%

62.32%

+44.41%

JNUG vs. UMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUG has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than UMDD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNUG vs. UMDD - Dividend Comparison

JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than UMDD's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares
1.81%1.04%2.01%1.62%0.00%0.52%0.10%0.46%0.06%0.51%0.00%0.00%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
0.74%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNUG and UMDD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNUG has higher volatility (39.22%) compared to UMDD (14.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs UMDD's -86.24%.

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 12.78% vs -26.31% for JNUG. On fees, UMDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 14.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 12.78% return vs -26.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UMDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for JNUG.

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.74% for UMDD.

JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%), while UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for JNUG and 0.95% for UMDD.

UMDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNUG and UMDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer