PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNUG vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNUG vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -43.35% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 57.68% return. Over the past 10 years, JNUG has underperformed TNA with an annualized return of -30.17%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.49% annualized return.


JNUG

1D
11.43%
1M
-20.63%
6M
-59.92%
YTD
-43.35%
1Y
45.37%
3Y*
49.80%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
-30.17%
ALL TIME*
-36.00%

TNA

1D
4.26%
1M
0.01%
6M
31.11%
YTD
57.68%
1Y
100.85%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
-2.25%
10Y*
7.49%
ALL TIME*
14.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNUG vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-43.35%478.59%9.96%-4.79%-43.60%-46.61%-85.51%82.43%-48.11%-20.18%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
57.68%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUG and TNA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

0.18

Over the past year, JNUG and TNA have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

JNUG vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNUG
TNA

Basic Materials

100.0%
4.4%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.6%

Energy

-

5.5%

Financial Services

-

17.5%

Healthcare

-

20.3%

Industrials

-

14.2%

Real Estate

-

6.6%

Technology

-

14.8%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Basic Materials

JNUG
100.0%
TNA
4.4%

Communication Services

JNUG

-

TNA
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

JNUG

-

TNA
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

JNUG

-

TNA
2.6%

Energy

JNUG

-

TNA
5.5%

Financial Services

JNUG

-

TNA
17.5%

Healthcare

JNUG

-

TNA
20.3%

Industrials

JNUG

-

TNA
14.2%

Real Estate

JNUG

-

TNA
6.6%

Technology

JNUG

-

TNA
14.8%

Utilities

JNUG

-

TNA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNUG vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNUG vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNUGTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

3.12

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.34

10.19

-8.85

JNUG vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUG and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNUG vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than TNA's maximum drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNUGTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-88.09%

-11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.58%

-32.53%

-38.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.58%

-65.78%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.67%

-82.36%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.66%

-88.09%

-11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.69%

-33.31%

-66.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.92%

-33.92%

-60.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.03%

9.94%

+24.09%

Volatility

JNUG vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) has a higher volatility of 29.35% compared to Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) at 10.13%. This indicates that JNUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNUGTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.35%

10.13%

+19.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

91.33%

42.46%

+48.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.74%

57.79%

+48.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.18%

67.23%

+14.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.01%

68.34%

+37.67%

JNUG vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUG has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNUG vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than TNA's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
2.52%1.04%2.01%1.62%0.00%0.52%0.10%0.46%0.06%0.51%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.29%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNUG and TNA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNUG has higher volatility (29.35%) compared to TNA (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, TNA leads with 7.49% vs -30.17% for JNUG. On fees, JNUG is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 10.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TNA has performed better with a 7.49% return vs -30.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JNUG is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.29% for TNA.

JNUG is categorized as Gold, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.03% for JNUG and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNUG and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer