JNUG vs. MUU
JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - JNUG is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%), while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. JNUG charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
JNUG vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JNUG
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -13.57%
- YTD
- -30.38%
- 6M
- -37.63%
- 1Y
- 83.68%
- 3Y*
- 67.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- -27.28%
MUU
- 1D
- 14.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JNUG vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -10.30% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNUG and MUU is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNUG vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
JNUG
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JNUG vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNUG | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNUG vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -14.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNUG | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -14.14% | -85.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.61% | 0.00% | -99.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -6.17% | -87.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.45% | — | — |
Volatility
JNUG vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNUG | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.94% | 222.50% | -118.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.49% | 222.50% | -141.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.75% | 222.50% | -115.75% |
JNUG vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNUG has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNUG vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 1.76% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 0.10% | 0.46% | 0.06% | 0.51% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNUG and MUU have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for JNUG.
JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
JNUG is categorized as Gold, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.03% for JNUG and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for JNUG and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer