PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNUG vs. GDXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNUG vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -13.94% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -37.13% return.


JNUG

1D
1.51%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-13.94%
6M
-0.62%
1Y
112.06%
3Y*
71.84%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
-23.85%

GDXU

1D
3.73%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
-37.13%
6M
-27.31%
1Y
85.47%
3Y*
52.20%
5Y*
-8.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNUG vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares
-13.94%478.59%9.96%-4.79%-43.60%-46.61%9.72%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN
-37.13%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUG and GDXU is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.98

The correlation between JNUG and GDXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

JNUG vs. GDXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNUG
GDXU

Basic Materials

100.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

JNUG
100.0%
GDXU
100.0%

Communication Services

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Consumer Cyclical

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Consumer Defensive

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Energy

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Financial Services

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Healthcare

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Industrials

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Real Estate

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Technology

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Utilities

JNUG

-

GDXU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNUG vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNUG vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNUGGDXUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

0.63

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

1.61

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.62

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.48

3.34

+2.14

JNUG vs. GDXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the GDXU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUG and GDXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNUGGDXUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.63

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

-0.07

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.29

-0.07

-0.22

Drawdowns

JNUG vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than GDXU's maximum drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and GDXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNUGGDXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-94.39%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.39%

-73.99%

+17.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.39%

-73.99%

+17.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.95%

-92.93%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.52%

-70.82%

-28.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.89%

-69.76%

-24.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.28%

35.93%

-10.65%

Volatility

JNUG vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) is 31.67%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a volatility of 45.40%. This indicates that JNUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNUGGDXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.67%

45.40%

-13.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

83.60%

117.57%

-33.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.37%

138.28%

-38.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.40%

110.85%

-30.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.52%

109.97%

-3.45%

JNUG vs. GDXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUG has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNUG vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison

JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares
1.43%1.04%2.01%1.62%0.00%0.52%0.10%0.46%0.06%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, JNUG and GDXU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GDXU has higher volatility (45.40%) compared to JNUG (31.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs GDXU's -94.39%.

On 5-year performance, JNUG leads with 12.42% vs -8.12% for GDXU. On fees, GDXU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, JNUG has been the lower-risk option at 31.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JNUG has performed better with a 12.42% return vs -8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDXU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for JNUG.

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.

JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%), while GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for JNUG and 0.95% for GDXU.

JNUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNUG and GDXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer