JNUG vs. BULZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares) and BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - JNUG tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%) while BULZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JNUG returned 61.16%/yr vs 77.02%/yr for BULZ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JNUG charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

JNUG vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -32.23% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 54.96% return.

JNUG

• 1D: 6.13%
• 1M: -37.63%
• YTD: -32.23%
• 6M: -30.59%
• 1Y: 61.91%
• 3Y*: 61.16%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: -26.31%

BULZ

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -11.00%
• YTD: 54.96%
• 6M: 57.61%
• 1Y: 163.08%
• 3Y*: 77.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNUG vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares	-32.23%	478.59%	9.96%	-4.79%	-43.60%	1.17%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	54.96%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUG and BULZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021	0.25

JNUG vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JNUG	BULZ
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	25.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	62.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

JNUG vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNUG

JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 25
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 21

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNUG vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JNUG	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	2.12	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	2.36	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.32	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	3.03	-2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.26	7.94	-5.69

JNUG vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUG and BULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JNUG vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than BULZ's maximum drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JNUG	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.95%	-94.44%	-5.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.53%	-54.22%	-13.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.53%	-67.96%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.62%	-26.99%	-72.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-93.87%	-58.18%	-35.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.53%	20.62%	+6.91%

Volatility

JNUG vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) has a higher volatility of 39.22% compared to MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) at 30.02%. This indicates that JNUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JNUG	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.22%	30.02%	+9.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	88.34%	61.86%	+26.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.58%	77.55%	+25.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.23%	91.54%	-10.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.73%	91.54%	+15.19%

JNUG vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUG has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

JNUG vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares	1.81%	1.04%	2.01%	1.62%	0.00%	0.52%	0.10%	0.46%	0.06%	0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JNUG and BULZ in my portfolio?

JNUG and BULZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JNUG or BULZ?

JNUG has higher volatility (39.22%) compared to BULZ (30.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs BULZ's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, JNUG or BULZ?

On 3-year performance, BULZ leads with 77.02% vs 61.16% for JNUG. On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BULZ has been the lower-risk option at 30.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JNUG or BULZ?

Over the 3-year period, BULZ has performed better with a 77.02% return vs 61.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JNUG or BULZ?

BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for JNUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JNUG or BULZ?

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

What is the main difference between JNUG and BULZ?

JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%), while BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for JNUG and 0.95% for BULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.