PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNSMX vs. WMRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNSMX vs. WMRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNSMX achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than WMRIX's 15.23% return. Over the past 10 years, JNSMX has outperformed WMRIX with an annualized return of 6.87%, while WMRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.


JNSMX

1D
0.21%
1M
3.67%
YTD
7.54%
6M
8.43%
1Y
18.73%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
6.87%

WMRIX

1D
-0.36%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
15.23%
6M
15.24%
1Y
23.00%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
5.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNSMX vs. WMRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNSMX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate
7.54%15.72%8.87%11.71%-17.38%7.25%14.46%15.62%-6.57%16.27%
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
15.23%12.79%2.57%1.12%-8.03%21.49%-2.19%16.85%-7.21%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between JNSMX and WMRIX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between JNSMX and WMRIX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNSMX vs. WMRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNSMX
JNSMX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
JNSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JNSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

WMRIX
WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNSMX vs. WMRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNSMXWMRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.79

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

3.70

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.51

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

6.44

-3.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.89

20.18

-8.30

JNSMX vs. WMRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNSMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the WMRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNSMX and WMRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNSMXWMRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.79

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.48

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.46

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.56

-0.05

Drawdowns

JNSMX vs. WMRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNSMX drawdown since its inception was -39.85%, which is greater than WMRIX's maximum drawdown of -37.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNSMX and WMRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNSMXWMRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.85%

-37.84%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-3.74%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.60%

-10.95%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-22.03%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

-31.27%

+6.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.52%

+3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-7.17%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.19%

+0.41%

Volatility

JNSMX vs. WMRIX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) at 2.56%. This indicates that JNSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNSMXWMRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.56%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

6.76%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

8.82%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.46%

11.54%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.19%

12.51%

-2.32%

JNSMX vs. WMRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNSMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WMRIX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNSMX vs. WMRIX - Dividend Comparison

JNSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, less than WMRIX's 6.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNSMX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate
5.49%5.90%4.28%1.53%2.96%13.36%4.49%5.72%4.86%7.24%1.87%9.16%
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
6.21%7.15%1.02%3.51%6.07%9.29%1.99%3.03%2.84%2.73%0.00%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNSMX and WMRIX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNSMX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to WMRIX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNSMX dropped -39.85% vs WMRIX's -37.84%.

WMRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNSMX and WMRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer