JNSMX vs. TIBAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JNSMX (Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate) and TIBAX (Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, JNSMX returned 6.91%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for TIBAX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JNSMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TIBAX.

Performance

JNSMX vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNSMX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly lower than TIBAX's 17.92% return. Over the past 10 years, JNSMX has underperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 6.91%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.

JNSMX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 7.99%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: 18.95%
• 3Y*: 13.06%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: 6.91%

TIBAX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 17.92%
• 6M: 21.20%
• 1Y: 39.47%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: 12.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNSMX vs. TIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JNSMX Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate	7.99%	15.72%	8.87%	11.71%	-17.38%	7.25%	14.46%	15.62%	-6.57%	16.27%
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund	17.92%	36.62%	13.23%	18.01%	-7.95%	20.08%	-0.67%	17.72%	-4.54%	14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between JNSMX and TIBAX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between JNSMX and TIBAX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

JNSMX vs. TIBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNSMX

JNSMX Risk / Return Rank: 57
JNSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
JNSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
JNSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
JNSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JNSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

TIBAX

TIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 98
TIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
TIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
TIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNSMX vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JNSMX	TIBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	4.75	-2.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	6.82	-3.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.96	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	7.36	-4.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.05	28.70	-16.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JNSMX vs. TIBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNSMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the TIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNSMX and TIBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JNSMX	TIBAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	4.75	-2.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	1.46	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.93	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.80	-0.28

Drawdowns

JNSMX vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNSMX drawdown since its inception was -39.85%, smaller than the maximum TIBAX drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNSMX and TIBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JNSMX	TIBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.85%	-49.12%	+9.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.00%	-5.43%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.60%	-9.20%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.15%	-20.94%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.15%	-34.85%	+9.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-5.99%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.39%	+0.21%

Volatility

JNSMX vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) have volatilities of 3.15% and 3.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JNSMX	TIBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	3.12%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.27%	6.97%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.71%	8.42%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.46%	11.12%	-0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.19%	13.46%	-3.27%

JNSMX vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNSMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

JNSMX vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison

JNSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than TIBAX's 4.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JNSMX Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate	5.47%	5.90%	4.28%	1.53%	2.96%	13.36%	4.49%	5.72%	4.86%	7.24%	1.87%	9.16%
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund	4.85%	5.64%	5.44%	4.67%	5.62%	5.10%	4.11%	4.23%	4.49%	4.22%	3.83%	4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JNSMX and TIBAX in my portfolio?

JNSMX and TIBAX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JNSMX or TIBAX?

JNSMX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to TIBAX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNSMX dropped -39.85% vs TIBAX's -49.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.75 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.