JNKE.L vs. QQQ
JNKE.L (SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JNKE.L is a European High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JNKE.L returned 3.10%/yr vs 21.60%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JNKE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
JNKE.L vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JNKE.L is traded in EUR, while QQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNKE.L achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 22.09% return. Over the past 10 years, JNKE.L has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 3.10%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.60% annualized return.
JNKE.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 22.09%
- 6M
- 18.99%
- 1Y
- 39.73%
- 3Y*
- 25.06%
- 5Y*
- 18.95%
- 10Y*
- 21.60%
JNKE.L vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNKE.L SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 1.14% | 5.01% | 5.84% | 11.68% | -10.56% | 2.88% | 1.85% | 10.51% | -4.34% | 4.97% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.17% | 6.44% | 33.87% | 50.21% | -28.40% | 36.95% | 36.37% | 42.10% | 4.56% | 16.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNKE.L and QQQ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2012 | 0.27 |
JNKE.L vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JNKE.L
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
JNKE.L
QQQ
Communication Services
JNKE.L
QQQ
Industrials
JNKE.L
QQQ
Technology
JNKE.L
QQQ
Real Estate
JNKE.L
QQQ
Basic Materials
JNKE.L
QQQ
Healthcare
JNKE.L
QQQ
Financial Services
JNKE.L
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
JNKE.L
QQQ
Utilities
JNKE.L
QQQ
Energy
JNKE.L
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNKE.L vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
JNKE.L
QQQ
JNKE.L vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (JNKE.L) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNKE.L | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 3.62 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 11.36 | -7.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNKE.L | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.48 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.86 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.96 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.79 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
JNKE.L vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNKE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNKE.L and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNKE.L | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.52% | -46.01% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -11.01% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.12% | -27.21% | +20.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.25% | -30.99% | +14.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.52% | -30.99% | +5.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.62% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -7.79% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 3.51% | -2.65% |
Volatility
JNKE.L vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (JNKE.L) is 1.15%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that JNKE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNKE.L | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 3.58% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 11.51% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.53% | 16.16% | -8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 22.02% | -15.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 22.60% | -15.64% |
JNKE.L vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNKE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNKE.L vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
JNKE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than QQQ's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNKE.L SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 5.35% | 5.48% | 5.85% | 4.95% | 3.47% | 2.91% | 3.14% | 3.08% | 2.87% | 3.57% | 3.58% | 3.92% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.40% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNKE.L and QQQ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNKE.L.
JNKE.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. JNKE.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNKE.L and 0.18% for QQQ.
Find the right allocation for JNKE.L and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer