PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNJ vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JNJ vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than PG's -0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 9.85%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.


JNJ

1D
0.16%
1M
0.14%
YTD
9.07%
6M
9.93%
1Y
48.18%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
9.85%

PG

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
-0.74%
6M
-3.04%
1Y
-13.56%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNJ vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
9.07%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
-0.74%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JNJ and PG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1970

0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JNJ:

$545.87B

PG:

$338.77B

EPS

JNJ:

$8.65

PG:

$5.23

PE Ratio

JNJ:

25.81

PG:

26.82

PEG Ratio

JNJ:

0.86

PG:

6.56

PS Ratio

JNJ:

5.64

PG:

3.93

PB Ratio

JNJ:

6.72

PG:

6.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

JNJ:

$96.36B

PG:

$86.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JNJ:

$66.60B

PG:

$43.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

JNJ:

$31.62B

PG:

$22.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNJ vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNJ vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNJPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

0.89

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

-0.87

+5.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

-1.45

+14.78

JNJ vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNJ and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNJPGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

-0.75

+3.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.18

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.44

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.46

+0.08

Drawdowns

JNJ vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and PG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNJPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.67%

-54.25%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-15.66%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-21.15%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.41%

-23.77%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

-23.77%

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.67%

-18.75%

+9.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.88%

-12.16%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

9.64%

-6.01%

Volatility

JNJ vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is 5.20%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that JNJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNJPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

6.16%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

14.82%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

18.24%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

17.70%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

19.00%

-0.55%

Dividends

JNJ vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than PG's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.35%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
3.04%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%

Financials

JNJ vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Johnson & Johnson and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


19.00B20.00B21.00B22.00B23.00B24.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
24.06B
21.24B
(JNJ) Total Revenue
(PG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

JNJ vs. PG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Johnson & Johnson and The Procter & Gamble Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
71.5%
49.5%
Portfolio components
JNJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

JNJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

JNJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JNJ and PG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PG has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to JNJ (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs PG's -54.25%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNJ and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer