JNJ vs. LUG.TO
JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) and LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) are both stocks. JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while LUG.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, JNJ returned 10.46%/yr vs 31.55%/yr for LUG.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JNJ vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JNJ is traded in USD, while LUG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 10.46%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 31.55% annualized return.
JNJ
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 57.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -16.07%
- YTD
- -27.93%
- 6M
- -25.81%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 77.02%
- 5Y*
- 48.80%
- 10Y*
- 31.55%
JNJ vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 17.68% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -27.93% | 309.94% | 76.65% | 32.70% | 22.82% | -4.62% | 34.40% | 74.11% | 1.61% | -7.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNJ and LUG.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
JNJ:
$588.98B
LUG.TO:
CA$18.65B
JNJ:
$8.65
LUG.TO:
$3.77
JNJ:
27.85
LUG.TO:
14.57
JNJ:
0.93
LUG.TO:
0.19
JNJ:
6.08
LUG.TO:
6.66
JNJ:
7.25
LUG.TO:
9.79
JNJ:
$96.36B
LUG.TO:
$2.00B
JNJ:
$66.60B
LUG.TO:
$1.41B
JNJ:
$31.62B
LUG.TO:
$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNJ vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
JNJ
LUG.TO
JNJ vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNJ | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.09 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | 0.38 | +4.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | 1.03 | +14.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNJ vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -95.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and LUG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNJ | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.67% | -95.13% | +44.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -39.12% | +28.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -39.12% | +23.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.41% | -43.37% | +24.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -46.50% | +19.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -36.18% | +33.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.90% | -71.98% | +60.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 14.44% | -10.72% |
Volatility
JNJ vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is 5.47%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 17.97%. This indicates that JNJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNJ | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 17.97% | -12.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 41.95% | -29.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 56.02% | -39.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 46.84% | -29.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 43.77% | -25.29% |
Dividends
JNJ vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than LUG.TO's 6.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.18% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 6.79% | 3.35% | 2.69% | 3.26% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
JNJ vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Johnson & Johnson and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JNJ vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JNJ and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for JNJ and LUG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer