PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNBSX vs. ICAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNBSX vs. ICAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNBSX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than ICAFX's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBSX has underperformed ICAFX with an annualized return of 5.92%, while ICAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.


JNBSX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.05%
6M
4.28%
YTD
5.77%
1Y
12.28%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
5.92%

ICAFX

1D
-0.57%
1M
1.28%
6M
7.47%
YTD
9.70%
1Y
17.34%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
13.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNBSX vs. ICAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNBSX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund
5.77%12.87%7.36%9.34%-12.81%9.19%6.24%14.95%-4.22%11.89%
ICAFX
American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2
9.70%20.69%25.14%28.82%-15.32%25.35%14.70%24.32%-8.02%19.75%

Correlation

The correlation between JNBSX and ICAFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2008

0.85

The correlation between JNBSX and ICAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNBSX vs. ICAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNBSX
JNBSX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JNBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JNBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ICAFX
ICAFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ICAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ICAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNBSX vs. ICAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNBSXICAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.77

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.13

7.70

+2.43

JNBSX vs. ICAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the ICAFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNBSX and ICAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNBSX vs. ICAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNBSX drawdown since its inception was -37.33%, smaller than the maximum ICAFX drawdown of -42.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBSX and ICAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNBSXICAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.33%

-42.84%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-10.05%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.90%

-17.39%

+9.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.22%

-24.21%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.60%

-31.07%

+7.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-1.16%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-5.46%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

2.31%

-1.07%

Volatility

JNBSX vs. ICAFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) is 2.30%, while American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that JNBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNBSXICAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

3.29%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.22%

10.63%

-4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

13.19%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.93%

16.13%

-8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.88%

16.57%

-8.69%

JNBSX vs. ICAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNBSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ICAFX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNBSX vs. ICAFX - Dividend Comparison

JNBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than ICAFX's 9.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICAFX
American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2
9.32%10.79%9.49%5.15%6.33%7.14%1.84%6.34%9.84%7.25%5.67%9.10%
JNBSX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund
5.18%5.16%5.90%5.07%4.61%8.53%3.47%4.17%4.56%3.89%4.40%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNBSX and ICAFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICAFX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to JNBSX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNBSX dropped -37.33% vs ICAFX's -42.84%.

JNBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNBSX and ICAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer