PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICAFX vs. JGASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICAFX vs. JGASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX) and JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund Class A (JGASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICAFX achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than JGASX's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ICAFX has underperformed JGASX with an annualized return of 14.49%, while JGASX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.50% annualized return.


ICAFX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.95%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
24.44%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
14.49%

JGASX

1D
0.04%
1M
5.72%
YTD
7.82%
6M
6.53%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
25.76%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
19.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICAFX vs. JGASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICAFX
American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2
10.98%20.69%25.14%28.82%-15.32%25.35%14.70%24.32%-8.02%19.75%
JGASX
JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund Class A
7.82%15.79%38.95%40.17%-30.05%21.89%53.67%36.24%-1.28%35.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ICAFX and JGASX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.90

The correlation between ICAFX and JGASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICAFX vs. JGASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICAFX
ICAFX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ICAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ICAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

JGASX
JGASX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
JGASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGASX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JGASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGASX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICAFX vs. JGASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX) and JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund Class A (JGASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICAFXJGASXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

1.58

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

2.17

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.28

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.56

+1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.54

4.99

+7.55

ICAFX vs. JGASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the JGASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICAFX and JGASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICAFXJGASXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

1.58

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.66

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.88

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.64

+0.01

Drawdowns

ICAFX vs. JGASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICAFX drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum JGASX drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAFX and JGASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICAFXJGASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-53.92%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-15.68%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.39%

-24.35%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.21%

-35.09%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.07%

-35.09%

+4.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-8.85%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

4.90%

-2.69%

Volatility

ICAFX vs. JGASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX) is 3.26%, while JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund Class A (JGASX) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that ICAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICAFXJGASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.83%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

11.77%

-2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

15.56%

-3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

22.35%

-6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

22.17%

-5.58%

ICAFX vs. JGASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICAFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than JGASX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICAFX vs. JGASX - Dividend Comparison

ICAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.75%, less than JGASX's 10.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICAFX
American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2
9.75%10.79%9.49%5.15%6.33%7.14%1.84%6.34%9.84%7.25%5.67%9.10%
JGASX
JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund Class A
10.92%11.77%11.84%0.60%0.40%14.74%10.07%9.58%9.61%4.13%0.00%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ICAFX and JGASX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JGASX has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to ICAFX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICAFX dropped -42.84% vs JGASX's -53.92%.

ICAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICAFX and JGASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer