PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNBSX vs. INPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNBSX vs. INPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNBSX achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than INPAX's 4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBSX has underperformed INPAX with an annualized return of 6.21%, while INPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.12% annualized return.


JNBSX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.97%
YTD
6.11%
6M
6.82%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
6.21%

INPAX

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.23%
YTD
4.09%
6M
4.93%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNBSX vs. INPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNBSX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund
6.11%12.87%7.36%9.34%-12.81%9.19%6.24%14.95%-4.22%11.89%
INPAX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio
4.09%13.33%9.26%9.53%-8.71%12.96%5.72%15.82%-3.60%11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JNBSX and INPAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.92

The correlation between JNBSX and INPAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNBSX vs. INPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNBSX
JNBSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JNBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
JNBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

INPAX
INPAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
INPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
INPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
INPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
INPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNBSX vs. INPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNBSXINPAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

2.21

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.57

3.10

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.43

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.29

+0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.36

9.97

+3.39

JNBSX vs. INPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNBSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the INPAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNBSX and INPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNBSXINPAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.21

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.81

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.92

-0.31

Drawdowns

JNBSX vs. INPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNBSX drawdown since its inception was -37.33%, which is greater than INPAX's maximum drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBSX and INPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNBSXINPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.33%

-21.25%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-5.89%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.90%

-7.77%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.22%

-15.36%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.60%

-21.25%

-2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-2.31%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.35%

-0.15%

Volatility

JNBSX vs. INPAX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX) at 1.82%. This indicates that JNBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNBSXINPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

1.82%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.36%

4.89%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.36%

6.06%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.81%

7.55%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.88%

8.36%

-0.48%

JNBSX vs. INPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNBSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than INPAX's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNBSX vs. INPAX - Dividend Comparison

JNBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than INPAX's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INPAX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio
4.68%4.87%5.21%4.82%4.90%4.43%5.59%4.57%4.85%3.29%3.58%3.90%
JNBSX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund
5.12%5.16%5.90%5.07%4.61%8.53%3.47%4.17%4.56%3.89%4.40%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JNBSX and INPAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JNBSX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to INPAX (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNBSX dropped -37.33% vs INPAX's -21.25%.

JNBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNBSX and INPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer