JNBSX vs. INPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX).
JNBSX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on May 30, 2007. INPAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 17, 2012.
Performance
JNBSX vs. INPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNBSX vs. INPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNBSX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund | -0.26% | 12.87% | 7.36% | 9.34% | -12.81% | 9.19% | 6.24% | 14.95% | -4.22% | 11.89% |
INPAX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio | -0.71% | 13.33% | 9.26% | 9.53% | -8.71% | 12.96% | 5.72% | 15.82% | -3.60% | 11.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNBSX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly higher than INPAX's -0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBSX has underperformed INPAX with an annualized return of 5.82%, while INPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.85% annualized return.
JNBSX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 11.15%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
INPAX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 10.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 6.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNBSX vs. INPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNBSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than INPAX's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNBSX vs. INPAX — Risk / Return Rank
JNBSX
INPAX
JNBSX vs. INPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNBSX | INPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 1.91 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.73 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 7.40 | +0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNBSX | INPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.78 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.82 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.88 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNBSX and INPAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JNBSX vs. INPAX - Dividend Comparison
JNBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than INPAX's 4.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNBSX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund | 5.30% | 5.16% | 5.90% | 5.07% | 4.61% | 8.53% | 3.47% | 4.17% | 4.56% | 3.89% | 4.40% | 4.20% |
INPAX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio | 4.91% | 4.87% | 5.21% | 4.82% | 4.90% | 4.43% | 5.59% | 4.57% | 4.85% | 3.29% | 3.58% | 3.90% |
Drawdowns
JNBSX vs. INPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNBSX drawdown since its inception was -37.33%, which is greater than INPAX's maximum drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBSX and INPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNBSX | INPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.33% | -21.25% | -16.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -6.26% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.22% | -15.36% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.60% | -21.25% | -2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -4.61% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -2.32% | -2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 1.46% | -0.06% |
Volatility
JNBSX vs. INPAX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX) at 3.10%. This indicates that JNBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNBSX | INPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.10% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.03% | 4.73% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.87% | 7.68% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 7.52% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.85% | 8.35% | -0.50% |