JNBAX vs. GGSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX).
JNBAX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the 60% MSCI World Index (net total return) / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. It was launched on May 31, 2007. GGSIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
JNBAX vs. GGSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNBAX vs. GGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNBAX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A | -1.82% | 12.74% | 7.22% | 9.20% | -12.97% | 8.82% | 6.09% | 14.81% | -4.46% | 11.85% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | -4.20% | 19.29% | 19.26% | 17.83% | -16.86% | 17.04% | 14.34% | 24.92% | -10.65% | 21.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNBAX achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly higher than GGSIX's -4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBAX has underperformed GGSIX with an annualized return of 5.48%, while GGSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
JNBAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 9.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
GGSIX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -4.20%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNBAX vs. GGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNBAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GGSIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNBAX vs. GGSIX — Risk / Return Rank
JNBAX
GGSIX
JNBAX vs. GGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNBAX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.54 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.07 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 4.87 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNBAX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.63 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.44 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNBAX and GGSIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JNBAX vs. GGSIX - Dividend Comparison
JNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, less than GGSIX's 12.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNBAX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A | 5.26% | 5.04% | 5.77% | 4.94% | 4.46% | 8.18% | 3.34% | 4.03% | 4.41% | 3.74% | 4.27% | 4.06% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | 12.39% | 11.87% | 12.21% | 1.73% | 5.76% | 6.57% | 3.47% | 5.77% | 3.02% | 2.77% | 1.35% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
JNBAX vs. GGSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNBAX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, smaller than the maximum GGSIX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBAX and GGSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNBAX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -52.85% | +15.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -10.84% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -26.74% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.56% | -30.36% | +6.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.74% | -8.71% | +2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -9.25% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 2.51% | -1.15% |
Volatility
JNBAX vs. GGSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) is 3.18%, while Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that JNBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNBAX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 4.54% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.89% | 8.19% | -3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.76% | 13.32% | -5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.72% | 13.34% | -5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 14.27% | -6.44% |