JMUEX vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JMUEX (JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both funds - JMUEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by JPMorgan, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Over the past 10 years, JMUEX returned 15.88%/yr vs 17.28%/yr for XLG. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMUEX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

JMUEX vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund (JMUEX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMUEX achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 8.03% return. Over the past 10 years, JMUEX has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 15.88%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.28% annualized return.

JMUEX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 5.57%
• 6M: 4.85%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: 15.88%

XLG

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.03%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 28.88%
• 3Y*: 24.70%
• 5Y*: 16.34%
• 10Y*: 17.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMUEX vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JMUEX JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund	5.57%	14.60%	31.22%	27.28%	-18.84%	28.55%	26.51%	32.26%	-5.90%	21.52%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	8.03%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between JMUEX and XLG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2005	0.95

The correlation between JMUEX and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JMUEX vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMUEX

JMUEX Risk / Return Rank: 30
JMUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
JMUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
JMUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JMUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
JMUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 60
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMUEX vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund (JMUEX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMUEX	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.18	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.95	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.38	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	2.34	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.89	8.77	-1.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JMUEX vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMUEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMUEX and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMUEX	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.18	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.88	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.92	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.63	-0.05

Drawdowns

JMUEX vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMUEX drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, roughly equal to the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMUEX and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMUEX	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.11%	-52.39%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.92%	-12.41%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.11%	-20.70%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.60%	-28.02%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.35%	-30.46%	-2.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-1.02%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.79%	-7.64%	-1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.30%	-0.35%

Volatility

JMUEX vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund (JMUEX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMUEX	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	3.19%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	9.81%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.25%	13.32%	-1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.41%	18.68%	-1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	18.84%	-0.28%

JMUEX vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMUEX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMUEX vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

JMUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JMUEX JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund	5.56%	5.85%	12.03%	2.06%	5.11%	10.74%	6.63%	10.06%	14.56%	8.71%	4.77%	6.17%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMUEX and XLG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, JMUEX and XLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JMUEX or XLG?

JMUEX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMUEX dropped -52.11% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.