JMTG vs. PIT
JMTG (JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMTG is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. JMTG charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
JMTG vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMTG achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.
JMTG
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- 27.31%
- 6M
- 26.74%
- 1Y
- 38.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMTG vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.71% | 3.94% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 27.31% | 13.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMTG and PIT is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMTG vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
JMTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PIT
JMTG vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMTG | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMTG vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMTG | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -14.05% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -14.05% | +12.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -4.07% | +3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility
JMTG vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMTG | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 21.66% | -17.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 17.50% | -13.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 17.50% | -13.80% |
JMTG vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMTG vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 3.91% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 7.00% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMTG and PIT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMTG is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMTG is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 3.91% for JMTG.
JMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMTG and 0.55% for PIT.
Find the right allocation for JMTG and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer