JMTG vs. AAVM

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

JMTG (JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and AAVM (Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMTG is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while AAVM is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JMTG returned 5.25% vs 27.11% for AAVM. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMTG charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AAVM.

Performance

JMTG vs. AAVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMTG achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than AAVM's 13.25% return.

JMTG

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.62%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAVM

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: 9.44%
• YTD: 13.25%
• 1Y: 27.11%
• 3Y*: 17.69%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMTG vs. AAVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.66%	3.94%
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	13.25%	11.33%

Correlation

The correlation between JMTG and AAVM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

JMTG vs. AAVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMTG

JMTG Risk / Return Rank: 46
JMTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
JMTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
JMTG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
JMTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
JMTG Martin Ratio Rank: 40

AAVM

AAVM Risk / Return Rank: 62
AAVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
AAVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
AAVM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
AAVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AAVM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMTG vs. AAVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMTG	AAVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.70	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.41	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.31	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.51	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.34	9.99	-4.65

JMTG vs. AAVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the AAVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMTG and AAVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMTG vs. AAVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum AAVM drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and AAVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMTG	AAVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-34.71%	+31.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.78%	-10.85%	+8.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-3.97%	+2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-13.21%	+12.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	2.72%	-1.73%

Volatility

JMTG vs. AAVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) is 1.25%, while Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that JMTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMTG	AAVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	5.73%	-4.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.88%	13.82%	-10.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.68%	16.08%	-12.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.71%	15.81%	-12.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.71%	14.95%	-11.24%

JMTG vs. AAVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than AAVM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMTG vs. AAVM - Dividend Comparison

JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than AAVM's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	1.81%	2.05%	2.54%	4.13%	2.24%	0.82%	0.00%	1.76%	0.93%	0.81%
JMTG JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	4.31%	2.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMTG and AAVM in my portfolio?

JMTG and AAVM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMTG or AAVM?

AAVM has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to JMTG (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMTG dropped -2.78% vs AAVM's -34.71%.

Which ETF is better, JMTG or AAVM?

On 1-year performance, AAVM leads with 27.11% vs 5.25% for JMTG. On fees, JMTG is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JMTG has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMTG or AAVM?

Over the 1-year period, AAVM has performed better with a 27.11% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMTG or AAVM?

JMTG is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AAVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMTG or AAVM?

JMTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 1.81% for AAVM.

What is the main difference between JMTG and AAVM?

JMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while AAVM is Multi-factor. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMTG and 0.45% for AAVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.