JMST vs. CSHI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JMST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF) and CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. JMST is actively managed, while CSHI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JMST returned 3.35%/yr vs 5.45%/yr for CSHI. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. JMST charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.

Performance

JMST vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMST achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 2.26% return.

JMST

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 1.32%
• 1Y: 2.98%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: 2.27%
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMST vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JMST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF	0.99%	3.35%	3.31%	3.56%	0.89%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	2.26%	5.05%	5.66%	6.21%	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between JMST and CSHI is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022	-0.01

JMST vs. CSHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JMST	CSHI
Financial Services	4.9%	11.8%
Technology	2.4%	35.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.3%	10.1%
Communication Services	0.9%	11.2%
Energy	0.7%	3.5%
Industrials	0.7%	8.3%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.9%
Healthcare	0.5%	8.5%
Basic Materials	0.5%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	4.9%
Utilities	0.2%	2.3%

Return for Risk

JMST vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMST

JMST Risk / Return Rank: 98
JMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
JMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
JMST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
JMST Martin Ratio Rank: 98

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMST vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMST	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.11	6.16	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.48	11.83	-3.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.57	2.75	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.74	29.16	-17.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	64.44	154.18	-89.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JMST vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMST Sharpe Ratio is 5.11, which is comparable to the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 6.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMST and CSHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMST	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.11	6.16	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.89	4.18	-2.29

Drawdowns

JMST vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMST drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMST and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMST	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-1.69%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.25%	-0.18%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.71%	-1.69%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.12%	-0.03%	-0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	0.03%	+0.02%

Volatility

JMST vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) has a higher volatility of 0.17% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) at 0.11%. This indicates that JMST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMST	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.17%	0.11%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.41%	0.52%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59%	0.86%	-0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.83%	1.32%	-0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.14%	1.32%	-0.18%

JMST vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMST vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

JMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than CSHI's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.90%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JMST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF	2.65%	2.84%	3.32%	3.09%	1.10%	0.27%	0.87%	1.63%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMST and CSHI in my portfolio?

JMST and CSHI have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMST or CSHI?

JMST has higher volatility (0.17%) compared to CSHI (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMST dropped -2.41% vs CSHI's -1.69%.

Which ETF is better, JMST or CSHI?

On 3-year performance, CSHI leads with 5.45% vs 3.35% for JMST. On fees, JMST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMST or CSHI?

Over the 3-year period, CSHI has performed better with a 5.45% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMST or CSHI?

JMST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMST or CSHI?

CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.65% for JMST.

What is the main difference between JMST and CSHI?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMST and 0.38% for CSHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.16 vs 5.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.