JMSCX vs. JANBX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JMSCX (Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative) and JANBX (Janus Henderson Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - JMSCX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Janus Henderson, while JANBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 10 years, JMSCX returned 5.26%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for JANBX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMSCX charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for JANBX.

Performance

JMSCX vs. JANBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative (JMSCX) and Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSCX achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than JANBX's 3.49% return. Over the past 10 years, JMSCX has underperformed JANBX with an annualized return of 5.26%, while JANBX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.

JMSCX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 6M: 5.61%
• 1Y: 13.94%
• 3Y*: 10.26%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 5.26%

JANBX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 3.49%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 13.70%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSCX vs. JANBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JMSCX Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative	5.86%	12.82%	6.61%	9.53%	-16.89%	4.04%	14.16%	12.08%	-5.05%	12.88%
JANBX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund	3.49%	14.99%	15.36%	15.38%	-16.60%	17.22%	14.34%	22.53%	0.64%	17.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSCX and JANBX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006	0.88

The correlation between JMSCX and JANBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JMSCX vs. JANBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSCX

JMSCX Risk / Return Rank: 59
JMSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
JMSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
JMSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
JMSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
JMSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

JANBX

JANBX Risk / Return Rank: 33
JANBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
JANBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
JANBX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JANBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
JANBX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSCX vs. JANBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative (JMSCX) and Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMSCX	JANBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.57	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	2.25	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.28	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	1.77	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.42	7.58	+3.84

JMSCX vs. JANBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the JANBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSCX and JANBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMSCX vs. JANBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSCX drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, smaller than the maximum JANBX drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSCX and JANBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMSCX	JANBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.37%	-31.70%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.40%	-8.13%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.06%	-11.91%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.04%	-21.52%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.04%	-22.49%	-1.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.60%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-6.63%	+2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	1.90%	-0.63%

Volatility

JMSCX vs. JANBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative (JMSCX) is 2.80%, while Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that JMSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JANBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMSCX	JANBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	3.51%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.05%	7.53%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.10%	9.20%	-2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.26%	11.27%	-3.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.58%	11.20%	-3.62%

JMSCX vs. JANBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSCX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than JANBX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMSCX vs. JANBX - Dividend Comparison

JMSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than JANBX's 8.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JANBX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund	8.53%	8.78%	6.96%	2.25%	1.95%	4.50%	2.49%	2.85%	7.06%	4.65%	2.55%	5.81%
JMSCX Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative	2.21%	2.34%	2.40%	1.68%	2.37%	10.31%	4.68%	4.85%	4.01%	5.93%	1.28%	5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMSCX and JANBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, JMSCX and JANBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JMSCX or JANBX?

JANBX has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to JMSCX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSCX dropped -28.37% vs JANBX's -31.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.