JMOM vs. JQUA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while JQUA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 15.10%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for JQUA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.

Performance

JMOM vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 21.70% return, which is significantly higher than JQUA's 11.30% return.

JMOM

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 21.70%
• 6M: 19.91%
• 1Y: 34.10%
• 3Y*: 27.39%
• 5Y*: 15.10%
• 10Y*: —

JQUA

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 11.30%
• 6M: 10.20%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 13.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMOM vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	21.70%	18.02%	28.47%	22.89%	-20.83%	25.03%	29.25%	28.24%	-5.25%	3.36%
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	11.30%	11.69%	21.21%	25.13%	-13.45%	28.68%	16.56%	28.47%	-2.98%	5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between JMOM and JQUA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017	0.90

The correlation between JMOM and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMOM vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JMOM	JQUA
Technology	43.1%	43.9%
Industrials	12.0%	8.0%
Financial Services	9.0%	11.1%
Healthcare	8.1%	7.9%
Communication Services	7.7%	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	5.2%
Energy	3.3%	3.4%
Real Estate	2.2%	2.1%
Utilities	2.0%	1.2%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.6%

Return for Risk

JMOM vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMOM

JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 76
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

JQUA

JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 55
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 48
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMOM vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMOM	JQUA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.69	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	2.37	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.29	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	2.84	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.57	11.58	+7.99

JMOM vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMOM and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMOM vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, roughly equal to the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and JQUA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMOM	JQUA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.31%	-32.92%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.87%	-7.13%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.51%	-16.81%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.26%	-22.47%	-5.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.53%	-2.77%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-4.15%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.75%	0.00%

Volatility

JMOM vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 5.52%. This indicates that JMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMOM	JQUA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	5.52%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.12%	9.51%	+3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	12.05%	+3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.87%	15.74%	+3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.19%	18.01%	+2.18%

JMOM vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JMOM and JQUA have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JMOM vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than JQUA's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	0.72%	0.86%	0.75%	1.21%	1.39%	0.64%	0.85%	1.11%	1.38%	0.29%
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	1.10%	1.19%	1.24%	1.21%	1.60%	1.32%	1.44%	1.67%	2.10%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMOM and JQUA in my portfolio?

JMOM and JQUA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMOM or JQUA?

JMOM has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to JQUA (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

Which ETF is better, JMOM or JQUA?

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 15.10% vs 13.08% for JQUA. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMOM or JQUA?

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 13.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMOM or JQUA?

JMOM and JQUA have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMOM or JQUA?

JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.72% for JMOM.

What is the main difference between JMOM and JQUA?

JMOM is categorized as Momentum, while JQUA is Large Cap Blend Equities. JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.