PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMMF vs. SBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMMF vs. SBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMMF achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than SBIL's 1.51% return.


JMMF

1D
0.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMMF vs. SBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMMF and SBIL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMMF vs. SBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JMMF vs. SBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMMFSBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.42

14.15

-7.73

Drawdowns

JMMF vs. SBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, which is greater than SBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMMF and SBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMMFSBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-0.03%

-0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.00%

-0.01%

Volatility

JMMF vs. SBIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMMFSBILDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54%

0.28%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.54%

0.28%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.54%

0.28%

+0.26%

JMMF vs. SBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMMF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIL's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMMF vs. SBIL - Dividend Comparison

JMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than SBIL's 3.26% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JMMF and SBIL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for JMMF.

SBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.59% for JMMF.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for JMMF and 0.15% for SBIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMMF and SBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer