PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMKIX vs. EDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMKIX vs. EDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JMKIX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMKIX achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than EDD's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, JMKIX has underperformed EDD with an annualized return of 3.95%, while EDD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.80% annualized return.


JMKIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.68%
YTD
2.92%
6M
3.30%
1Y
11.52%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
3.95%

EDD

1D
0.88%
1M
4.55%
YTD
8.70%
6M
6.74%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
5.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMKIX vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMKIX
John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund
2.92%12.17%6.13%10.15%-15.69%-2.53%5.09%14.51%-5.80%13.40%
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
8.70%32.46%8.64%14.09%-14.15%-7.03%-2.84%25.45%-14.09%16.34%

Correlation

The correlation between JMKIX and EDD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMKIX vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMKIX
JMKIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
JMKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JMKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EDD
EDD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMKIX vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JMKIX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMKIXEDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.25

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

1.28

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

4.09

+8.59

JMKIX vs. EDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the EDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMKIX and EDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMKIX vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMKIX drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum EDD drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMKIX and EDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMKIXEDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-59.38%

+32.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-17.67%

+13.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.85%

-17.67%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.36%

-32.04%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.36%

-42.70%

+15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-4.33%

+3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-24.18%

+19.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

5.51%

-4.55%

Volatility

JMKIX vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JMKIX) is 1.38%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that JMKIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMKIXEDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

4.25%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

13.20%

-9.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52%

16.39%

-11.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.12%

15.41%

-9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.46%

17.66%

-11.20%

JMKIX vs. EDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMKIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than EDD's 2.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMKIX vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison

JMKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, less than EDD's 8.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
8.89%9.76%11.45%7.30%6.82%6.93%6.92%8.15%9.90%8.18%10.32%12.65%
JMKIX
John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.56%5.76%4.60%4.21%4.86%3.97%4.43%4.35%5.55%5.31%6.05%5.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMKIX and EDD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDD has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to JMKIX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMKIX dropped -27.36% vs EDD's -59.38%.

JMKIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMKIX and EDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer