PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMKIX vs. EMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMKIX vs. EMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JMKIX) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMKIX achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, JMKIX has outperformed EMB with an annualized return of 3.40%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.84% annualized return.


JMKIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.58%
6M
0.99%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
3.40%
ALL TIME*
4.56%

EMB

1D
0.53%
1M
-1.08%
6M
1.15%
YTD
1.44%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
2.84%
ALL TIME*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$587.25M$554.34M$591.84M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JMKIX vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMKIX
John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund
1.84%12.17%6.13%10.15%-15.69%-2.53%5.09%14.51%-5.80%13.40%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
1.44%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%-5.47%10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JMKIX and EMB is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010

0.66

The correlation between JMKIX and EMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMKIX vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JMKIX
JMKIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
JMKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
JMKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JMKIX vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JMKIX) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMKIXEMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.68

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.15

6.82

+1.33

JMKIX vs. EMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMKIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the EMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMKIX and EMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMKIX vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMKIX drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMKIX and EMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMKIXEMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-34.70%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-4.51%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.73%

-6.91%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.36%

-28.74%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.36%

-28.74%

+1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-1.30%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-5.02%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.11%

-0.12%

Volatility

JMKIX vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JMKIX) is 0.88%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that JMKIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMKIXEMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

1.51%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.59%

4.80%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.47%

5.70%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.12%

9.77%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.44%

9.95%

-3.51%

JMKIX vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMKIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMKIX vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison

JMKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, which matches EMB's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.14%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
JMKIX
John Hancock Funds Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.10%5.76%4.60%4.21%4.86%3.97%4.43%4.35%5.55%5.31%6.05%5.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMKIX and EMB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMB has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to JMKIX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMKIX dropped -27.36% vs EMB's -34.70%.

JMKIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMKIX and EMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer