JMID vs. KOMP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

JMID (Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and KOMP (SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. JMID is actively managed, while KOMP is passively managed. Over the past year, JMID returned 8.78% vs 30.79% for KOMP. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMID charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for KOMP.

Performance

JMID vs. KOMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMID achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than KOMP's 14.62% return.

JMID

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 5.78%
• 6M: 3.60%
• 1Y: 8.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KOMP

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -5.70%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 30.79%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 1.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMID vs. KOMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JMID Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF	5.78%	5.56%	11.33%
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	14.62%	19.74%	6.91%

Correlation

The correlation between JMID and KOMP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	0.85

The correlation between JMID and KOMP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMID vs. KOMP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JMID	KOMP
Technology	28.3%	35.5%
Industrials	24.5%	27.7%
Consumer Cyclical	18.1%	4.3%
Healthcare	11.1%	11.1%
Financial Services	5.1%	6.2%
Communication Services	4.9%	5.3%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	0.2%
Basic Materials	1.5%	2.5%
Energy	1.5%	2.4%
Utilities	0.7%	4.8%

Return for Risk

JMID vs. KOMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMID

JMID Risk / Return Rank: 18
JMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
JMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
JMID Omega Ratio Rank: 15
JMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
JMID Martin Ratio Rank: 22

KOMP

KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 40
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 36
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMID vs. KOMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMID	KOMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	1.25	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	1.75	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.22	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.82	2.00	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.66	6.10	-3.44

JMID vs. KOMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the KOMP Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMID and KOMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMID vs. KOMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMID drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, smaller than the maximum KOMP drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMID and KOMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMID	KOMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.58%	-50.06%	+24.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.82%	-15.50%	+4.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.51%	-9.17%	+4.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-21.57%	+17.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	5.06%	-1.76%

Volatility

JMID vs. KOMP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) is 5.32%, while SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a volatility of 10.15%. This indicates that JMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KOMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMID	KOMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	10.15%	-4.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.30%	19.71%	-6.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.89%	24.67%	-7.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.53%	25.09%	-3.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.53%	27.12%	-5.59%

JMID vs. KOMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMID has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than KOMP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMID vs. KOMP - Dividend Comparison

JMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than KOMP's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JMID Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF	0.66%	0.75%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	1.52%	1.84%	1.04%	1.27%	1.47%	1.44%	0.69%	0.81%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMID and KOMP in my portfolio?

JMID and KOMP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMID or KOMP?

KOMP has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to JMID (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMID dropped -25.58% vs KOMP's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, JMID or KOMP?

On 1-year performance, KOMP leads with 30.79% vs 8.78% for JMID. On fees, KOMP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JMID has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMID or KOMP?

Over the 1-year period, KOMP has performed better with a 30.79% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMID or KOMP?

KOMP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMID or KOMP?

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.66% for JMID.

What is the main difference between JMID and KOMP?

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMID and 0.20% for KOMP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KOMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.