PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMID vs. JRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMID vs. JRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMID achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than JRE's 16.53% return.


JMID

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.25%
YTD
7.39%
6M
5.11%
1Y
12.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JRE

1D
1.21%
1M
0.80%
YTD
16.53%
6M
16.75%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMID vs. JRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
7.39%5.56%11.33%
JRE
Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF
16.53%2.97%-6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JMID and JRE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

0.42

JMID vs. JRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMID
JRE

Technology

28.3%

-

Industrials

24.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

18.1%
4.3%

Healthcare

11.1%

-

Financial Services

5.1%

-

Communication Services

4.9%

-

Real Estate

2.2%
95.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Energy

1.5%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Technology

JMID
28.3%
JRE

-

Industrials

JMID
24.5%
JRE

-

Consumer Cyclical

JMID
18.1%
JRE
4.3%

Healthcare

JMID
11.1%
JRE

-

Financial Services

JMID
5.1%
JRE

-

Communication Services

JMID
4.9%
JRE

-

Real Estate

JMID
2.2%
JRE
95.7%

Consumer Defensive

JMID
2.1%
JRE

-

Basic Materials

JMID
1.5%
JRE

-

Energy

JMID
1.5%
JRE

-

Utilities

JMID
0.7%
JRE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMID vs. JRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMID
JMID Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
JMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMID Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
JMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMID Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

JRE
JRE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
JRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMID vs. JRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMIDJREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.25

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.69

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

8.30

-4.58

JMID vs. JRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the JRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMID and JRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMID vs. JRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMID drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, smaller than the maximum JRE drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMID and JRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMIDJREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.58%

-31.69%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-7.14%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-0.81%

-2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-12.51%

+7.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

2.31%

+0.96%

Volatility

JMID vs. JRE - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMIDJREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

5.35%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

10.23%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.92%

13.83%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

18.73%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.56%

18.73%

+2.83%

JMID vs. JRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMID has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JRE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMID vs. JRE - Dividend Comparison

JMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than JRE's 4.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.65%0.75%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JRE
Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.85%5.81%2.20%2.77%2.87%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMID and JRE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JRE has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to JMID (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMID dropped -25.58% vs JRE's -31.69%.

On 1-year performance, JRE leads with 19.12% vs 12.15% for JMID. On fees, JMID is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JMID has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JRE has performed better with a 19.12% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMID is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JRE.

JRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 0.65% for JMID.

Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMID and 0.65% for JRE.

JRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMID and JRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer