JMIA vs. FXI
JMIA (Jumia Technologies AG) is a stock, while FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index. Over the past 5 years, JMIA returned -21.97%/yr vs -2.64%/yr for FXI. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JMIA vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMIA achieves a -47.88% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's -9.14% return.
JMIA
- 1D
- -4.96%
- 1M
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -49.06%
- YTD
- -47.88%
- 1Y
- 44.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- -21.97%
- 10Y*
- —
FXI
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- -13.03%
- YTD
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- -6.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- -2.64%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
JMIA vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMIA Jumia Technologies AG | -47.88% | 226.96% | 8.22% | 9.97% | -71.84% | -71.75% | 499.55% | -64.49% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -9.14% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMIA and FXI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMIA vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
JMIA
FXI
JMIA vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMIA | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.96 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.27 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | -0.64 | +1.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMIA vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMIA drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, which is greater than FXI's maximum drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMIA and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMIA | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.36% | -72.68% | -24.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.19% | -22.94% | -34.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.12% | -28.72% | -59.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.77% | -52.08% | -40.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.06% | -28.45% | -61.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.40% | -31.22% | -50.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.57% | 9.59% | +23.98% |
Volatility
JMIA vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) has a higher volatility of 15.82% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 6.30%. This indicates that JMIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMIA | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.82% | 6.30% | +9.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.71% | 14.30% | +35.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.17% | 20.04% | +59.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.48% | 31.67% | +59.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.53% | 27.58% | +75.95% |
Dividends
JMIA vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
JMIA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 1.97% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
JMIA Jumia Technologies AG | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMIA and FXI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMIA has higher volatility (15.82%) compared to FXI (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMIA dropped -97.36% vs FXI's -72.68%.
JMIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMIA and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer