JMIA vs. FXI
JMIA (Jumia Technologies AG) is a stock, while FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index. Over the past 5 years, JMIA returned -26.63%/yr vs -5.43%/yr for FXI. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JMIA vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMIA achieves a -49.96% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's -16.64% return.
JMIA
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -12.46%
- YTD
- -49.96%
- 6M
- -50.83%
- 1Y
- 92.31%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- -26.63%
- 10Y*
- —
FXI
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -16.64%
- 6M
- -17.20%
- 1Y
- -12.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- -5.43%
- 10Y*
- 2.22%
JMIA vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMIA Jumia Technologies AG | -49.96% | 226.96% | 8.22% | 9.97% | -71.84% | -71.75% | 499.55% | -64.49% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -16.64% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMIA and FXI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMIA vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
JMIA
FXI
JMIA vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMIA | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.90 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | -0.57 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | -1.55 | +4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMIA vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMIA drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, which is greater than FXI's maximum drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMIA and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMIA | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.36% | -72.68% | -24.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.19% | -22.72% | -34.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.12% | -28.72% | -59.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.53% | -54.94% | -39.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.46% | -34.36% | -56.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.34% | -31.21% | -50.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.18% | 8.36% | +22.82% |
Volatility
JMIA vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) has a higher volatility of 17.76% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 6.21%. This indicates that JMIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMIA | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.76% | 6.21% | +11.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.12% | 14.81% | +35.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.82% | 19.88% | +61.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.59% | 31.72% | +59.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.84% | 27.60% | +76.24% |
Dividends
JMIA vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
JMIA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.14% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
JMIA Jumia Technologies AG | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMIA and FXI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMIA has higher volatility (17.76%) compared to FXI (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMIA dropped -97.36% vs FXI's -72.68%.
JMIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMIA and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer