PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMIA vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JMIA vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JMIA vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMIA
Jumia Technologies AG
-44.76%226.96%8.22%9.97%-71.84%-71.75%499.55%-73.57%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
-8.12%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%11.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMIA achieves a -44.76% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's -8.12% return.


JMIA

1D
7.48%
1M
-16.16%
YTD
-44.76%
6M
-40.57%
1Y
220.93%
3Y*
28.00%
5Y*
-28.91%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
4.08%
1M
-5.34%
YTD
-8.12%
6M
-6.05%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
15.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMIA vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMIA
JMIA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JMIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JMIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMIA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMIA vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMIASPYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

1.01

+1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.14

1.58

+1.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

1.66

+2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.75

6.54

+4.20

JMIA vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMIA and SPYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMIASPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

1.01

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

0.58

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.31

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between JMIA and SPYG is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

JMIA vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

JMIA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMIA
Jumia Technologies AG
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.58%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Drawdowns

JMIA vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMIA drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMIA and SPYG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JMIASPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.36%

-67.63%

-29.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.03%

-13.76%

-42.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.52%

-32.67%

-62.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.47%

-10.24%

-79.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.12%

-24.48%

-56.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.36%

3.50%

+15.86%

Volatility

JMIA vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) has a higher volatility of 17.12% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 7.20%. This indicates that JMIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JMIASPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.12%

7.20%

+9.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.76%

12.83%

+37.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.81%

22.39%

+64.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.98%

21.13%

+70.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.01%

20.57%

+83.44%