JMHI vs. IVES

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JMHI (JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF) and IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMHI is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while IVES is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. JMHI is actively managed, while IVES is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMHI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVES.

Performance

JMHI vs. IVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMHI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than IVES's 27.14% return.

JMHI

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 6.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVES

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: 18.28%
• YTD: 27.14%
• 6M: 24.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMHI vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF	1.56%	4.49%
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF	27.14%	25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between JMHI and IVES is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.13

JMHI vs. IVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JMHI	IVES
Technology	29.0%	67.8%
Healthcare	14.5%	-
Financial Services	12.3%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	12.9%
Industrials	9.0%	4.3%
Communication Services	7.8%	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	-
Energy	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.4%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Utilities	2.2%	1.7%

Return for Risk

JMHI vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMHI

JMHI Risk / Return Rank: 54
JMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
JMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
JMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
JMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMHI vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMHI	IVES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.55	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMHI	IVES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	2.32	-1.27

Drawdowns

JMHI vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMHI drawdown since its inception was -7.11%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMHI and IVES.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMHI	IVES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.11%	-22.64%	+15.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-3.69%	+3.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-5.63%	+4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JMHI	IVES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.33%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.24%	25.77%	-22.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.50%	25.77%	-21.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.50%	25.77%	-21.27%

JMHI vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMHI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMHI vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison

JMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than IVES's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF	0.33%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF	4.54%	4.42%	4.49%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMHI and IVES in my portfolio?

JMHI and IVES have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JMHI or IVES?

On fees, JMHI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMHI or IVES?

JMHI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMHI or IVES?

JMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.33% for IVES.

What is the main difference between JMHI and IVES?

JMHI is categorized as High Yield Muni, while IVES is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JMHI and 0.75% for IVES.