PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTAX vs. EVYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTAX vs. EVYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HTAX having a 3.94% return and EVYM slightly lower at 3.83%.


HTAX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.09%
YTD
3.94%
6M
4.24%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVYM

1D
0.13%
1M
1.59%
YTD
3.83%
6M
4.13%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTAX vs. EVYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HTAX and EVYM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.83

The correlation between HTAX and EVYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTAX vs. EVYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTAX
HTAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EVYM
EVYM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EVYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EVYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTAX vs. EVYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTAXEVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.57

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

3.64

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

13.77

-5.69

HTAX vs. EVYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the EVYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTAX and EVYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTAX vs. EVYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAX drawdown since its inception was -6.10%, roughly equal to the maximum EVYM drawdown of -6.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAX and EVYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTAXEVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-6.08%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-2.77%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.16%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-1.43%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.73%

+0.30%

Volatility

HTAX vs. EVYM - Volatility Comparison

Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) at 1.03%. This indicates that HTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTAXEVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.03%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

2.68%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.67%

3.67%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

6.00%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

6.00%

+0.41%

HTAX vs. EVYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EVYM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTAX vs. EVYM - Dividend Comparison

HTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than EVYM's 4.76% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HTAX and EVYM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTAX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to EVYM (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTAX dropped -6.10% vs EVYM's -6.08%.

On 1-year performance, EVYM leads with 10.04% vs 8.28% for HTAX. On fees, EVYM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EVYM has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVYM has performed better with a 10.04% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVYM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HTAX.

EVYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.46% for HTAX.

They also come from different issuers: Nomura and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTAX and 0.40% for EVYM.

EVYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTAX and EVYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer