PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMCRX vs. GLRBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMCRX vs. GLRBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in James Micro Cap Fund (JMCRX) and James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMCRX achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than GLRBX's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, JMCRX has outperformed GLRBX with an annualized return of 9.07%, while GLRBX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.03% annualized return.


JMCRX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
13.20%
6M
13.90%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
9.07%

GLRBX

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.60%
YTD
5.44%
6M
5.75%
1Y
17.51%
3Y*
12.65%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
5.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMCRX vs. GLRBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMCRX
James Micro Cap Fund
13.20%4.37%5.95%31.72%-17.33%36.27%-4.21%30.55%-16.62%2.88%
GLRBX
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund
5.44%13.16%12.27%11.52%-12.77%12.69%1.54%12.10%-10.60%6.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JMCRX and GLRBX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2010

0.79

The correlation between JMCRX and GLRBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMCRX vs. GLRBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMCRX
JMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GLRBX
GLRBX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GLRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMCRX vs. GLRBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for James Micro Cap Fund (JMCRX) and James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMCRXGLRBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.24

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

14.87

-6.67

JMCRX vs. GLRBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMCRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the GLRBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMCRX and GLRBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMCRXGLRBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.51

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.78

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.61

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.67

-0.18

Drawdowns

JMCRX vs. GLRBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMCRX drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than GLRBX's maximum drawdown of -21.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMCRX and GLRBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMCRXGLRBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-21.59%

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-5.55%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.90%

-8.75%

-18.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.90%

-16.73%

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.65%

-16.86%

-29.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-0.47%

-2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-3.27%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

1.20%

+2.35%

Volatility

JMCRX vs. GLRBX - Volatility Comparison

James Micro Cap Fund (JMCRX) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) at 2.41%. This indicates that JMCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLRBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMCRXGLRBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

2.41%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

5.85%

+7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.49%

7.15%

+11.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

8.38%

+12.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.67%

8.30%

+13.37%

JMCRX vs. GLRBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMCRX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than GLRBX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMCRX vs. GLRBX - Dividend Comparison

JMCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than GLRBX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLRBX
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund
4.73%4.95%3.31%2.05%5.18%6.72%1.14%1.90%11.45%7.69%1.59%2.59%
JMCRX
James Micro Cap Fund
0.90%1.02%1.43%0.63%9.14%3.84%0.53%6.35%6.71%7.80%0.00%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMCRX and GLRBX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMCRX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to GLRBX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMCRX dropped -46.65% vs GLRBX's -21.59%.

GLRBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMCRX and GLRBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer