GLRBX vs. TSAIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GLRBX (James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund) and TSAIX (TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, GLRBX returned 5.11%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for TSAIX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLRBX charges 1.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for TSAIX.

Performance

GLRBX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRBX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than TSAIX's 10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, GLRBX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 5.11%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.15% annualized return.

GLRBX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 5.38%
• 1Y: 17.73%
• 3Y*: 12.35%
• 5Y*: 6.91%
• 10Y*: 5.11%

TSAIX

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: 10.50%
• 6M: 10.41%
• 1Y: 26.71%
• 3Y*: 18.10%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 12.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRBX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLRBX James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund	5.77%	13.16%	12.27%	11.52%	-12.77%	12.69%	1.54%	12.10%	-10.60%	6.03%
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund	10.50%	20.04%	15.46%	22.72%	-19.57%	17.10%	19.69%	27.97%	-11.27%	22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRBX and TSAIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2011	0.91

The correlation between GLRBX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLRBX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRBX

GLRBX Risk / Return Rank: 78
GLRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
GLRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GLRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GLRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GLRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

TSAIX

TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 51
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRBX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLRBX	TSAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.93	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.67	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.35	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	2.58	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.44	11.06	+3.39

GLRBX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRBX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLRBX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRBX drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRBX and TSAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLRBX	TSAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.59%	-34.58%	+12.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.55%	-10.28%	+4.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.75%	-17.29%	+8.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.73%	-28.28%	+11.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.86%	-34.58%	+17.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.12%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-4.90%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	2.38%	-1.16%

Volatility

GLRBX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) is 2.80%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that GLRBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLRBX	TSAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	5.38%	-2.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.29%	11.28%	-4.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.52%	13.69%	-6.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.44%	16.38%	-7.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.33%	17.70%	-9.37%

GLRBX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRBX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLRBX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

GLRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than TSAIX's 6.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLRBX James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund	4.72%	4.95%	3.31%	2.05%	5.18%	6.72%	1.14%	1.90%	11.45%	7.69%	1.59%	2.59%
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund	6.68%	7.38%	2.94%	1.81%	9.27%	11.82%	5.59%	5.71%	5.71%	1.13%	4.12%	7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLRBX and TSAIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, GLRBX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GLRBX or TSAIX?

TSAIX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to GLRBX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRBX dropped -21.59% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLRBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.