Correlation
The correlation between GLRBX and FPACX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
GLRBX vs. FPACX
Compare and contrast key facts about James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX).
GLRBX is managed by James Advantage. It was launched on Jun 30, 1991. FPACX is managed by FPA. It was launched on Jun 1, 1993.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLRBX or FPACX.
Performance
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
GLRBX:
0.78
FPACX:
0.89
GLRBX:
1.05
FPACX:
1.25
GLRBX:
1.14
FPACX:
1.18
GLRBX:
0.75
FPACX:
0.89
GLRBX:
2.78
FPACX:
3.62
GLRBX:
2.35%
FPACX:
2.68%
GLRBX:
9.34%
FPACX:
11.60%
GLRBX:
-21.58%
FPACX:
-31.59%
GLRBX:
-1.96%
FPACX:
-0.62%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRBX achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than FPACX's 4.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GLRBX has underperformed FPACX with an annualized return of 3.02%, while FPACX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.99% annualized return.
GLRBX
0.95%
1.96%
-1.29%
7.24%
6.68%
5.82%
3.02%
FPACX
4.08%
4.21%
2.76%
10.27%
11.24%
13.40%
7.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRBX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FPACX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLRBX vs. FPACX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLRBX
FPACX
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Dividend Comparison
GLRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than FPACX's 8.95% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRBX James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund | 3.38% | 3.32% | 2.04% | 5.18% | 6.72% | 1.14% | 1.90% | 11.44% | 7.69% | 1.59% | 2.59% | 4.40% |
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund | 8.95% | 9.31% | 2.80% | 0.77% | 11.62% | 4.80% | 4.65% | 8.87% | 3.70% | 4.98% | 6.34% | 4.18% |
Drawdowns
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRBX drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, smaller than the maximum FPACX drawdown of -31.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRBX and FPACX.
Loading data...
Volatility
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) is 2.07%, while FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that GLRBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...