GLRBX vs. FPACX
Compare and contrast key facts about James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX).
GLRBX is managed by James Advantage. It was launched on Jun 30, 1991. FPACX is managed by FPA. It was launched on Jun 1, 1993.
Performance
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRBX James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund | -2.31% | 13.16% | 12.27% | 11.52% | -12.77% | 12.69% | 1.54% | 12.10% | -10.60% | 6.03% |
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund | -3.27% | 17.69% | 12.42% | 20.30% | -9.20% | 15.09% | 12.14% | 20.03% | -7.42% | 10.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRBX achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly higher than FPACX's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GLRBX has underperformed FPACX with an annualized return of 4.22%, while FPACX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.35% annualized return.
GLRBX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 11.55%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.22%
FPACX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRBX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FPACX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLRBX vs. FPACX — Risk / Return Rank
GLRBX
FPACX
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRBX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.27 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 1.84 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.71 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 6.19 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRBX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.27 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.67 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.71 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.86 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRBX and FPACX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Dividend Comparison
GLRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, less than FPACX's 9.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRBX James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund | 5.11% | 4.95% | 3.31% | 2.05% | 5.18% | 6.72% | 1.14% | 1.90% | 11.45% | 7.69% | 1.59% | 2.59% |
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund | 9.92% | 9.60% | 7.95% | 3.72% | 0.77% | 11.62% | 4.80% | 4.65% | 8.87% | 3.70% | 4.98% | 6.34% |
Drawdowns
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRBX drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum FPACX drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRBX and FPACX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRBX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.59% | -31.60% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.75% | -7.37% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.73% | -18.47% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.86% | -29.46% | +12.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -7.19% | +1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -3.89% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 2.04% | -0.69% |
Volatility
GLRBX vs. FPACX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) is 2.86%, while FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that GLRBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLRBX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 3.28% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.23% | 6.37% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 11.09% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 11.86% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.23% | 13.17% | -4.94% |