JLQD vs. LQDW
JLQD (Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF) and LQDW (iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - JLQD tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index while LQDW tracks the CBOE LQD BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JLQD returned 5.54%/yr vs 3.79%/yr for LQDW. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JLQD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for LQDW.
Performance
JLQD vs. LQDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLQD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than LQDW's 1.25% return.
JLQD
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDW
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JLQD vs. LQDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | 0.24% | 7.77% | 3.21% | 8.76% | -3.27% |
LQDW iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 1.25% | 9.05% | 2.60% | 3.99% | -6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between JLQD and LQDW is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between JLQD and LQDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JLQD vs. LQDW — Risk / Return Rank
JLQD
LQDW
JLQD vs. LQDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JLQD | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.51 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | 9.39 | -1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JLQD | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.85 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.46 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
JLQD vs. LQDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLQD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than LQDW's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLQD and LQDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLQD | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.17% | -9.20% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -2.59% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.84% | -6.74% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.35% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -2.35% | -6.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 0.69% | +0.13% |
Volatility
JLQD vs. LQDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) is 1.25%, while iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that JLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JLQD | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.46% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 3.02% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 3.53% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 5.49% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 5.49% | +0.83% |
JLQD vs. LQDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
JLQD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDW's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
JLQD vs. LQDW - Dividend Comparison
JLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than LQDW's 12.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | 5.44% | 5.28% | 5.36% | 3.99% | 2.77% | 0.83% |
LQDW iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 12.57% | 16.02% | 15.74% | 19.28% | 8.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JLQD and LQDW have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQDW has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to JLQD (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLQD dropped -21.17% vs LQDW's -9.20%.
On 3-year performance, JLQD leads with 5.54% vs 3.79% for LQDW. On fees, JLQD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JLQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JLQD has performed better with a 5.54% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JLQD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for LQDW.
LQDW has the higher dividend yield at 12.57%, compared with 5.44% for JLQD.
JLQD tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index, while LQDW tracks CBOE LQD BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JLQD and 0.34% for LQDW.
LQDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JLQD and LQDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer